Challenging Identity: Kierkegaard, Bias, and Intersectionality

Kierkegaard was deeply biased and his philosophy is marred by these biases. The argument of this article is that we need to address Kierkegaard’s biases in order to bring out the relevance of his work on human identity in the 21st century. Rather than investigate a specific biased topic, I want to a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rosfort, René 1975- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI 2022
In: Religions
Year: 2022, Volume: 13, Issue: 5
Further subjects:B Theunissen
B Kierkegaard
B Adorno
B Intersectionality
B Identity
B Test bias
B Freedom
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1807456838
003 DE-627
005 20220622141201.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220622s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel13050466  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1807456838 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1807456838 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1041401698  |0 (DE-627)76708974X  |0 (DE-576)393080005  |4 aut  |a Rosfort, René  |d 1975- 
109 |a Rosfort, René 1975- 
245 1 0 |a Challenging Identity: Kierkegaard, Bias, and Intersectionality 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Kierkegaard was deeply biased and his philosophy is marred by these biases. The argument of this article is that we need to address Kierkegaard’s biases in order to bring out the relevance of his work on human identity in the 21st century. Rather than investigate a specific biased topic, I want to articulate the way in which Kierkegaard’s biases present a serious problem for his account of identity, in particular with regard to his concepts of eternity and freedom. I spend the first part of this article examining problems in Kierkegaard’s approach to identity before turning to the strengths of his work in the second part. I use Theodor W. Adorno’s critique of Kierkegaard and Michael Theunissen’s development of this critique to bring out both the weaknesses and the strengths of Kierkegaard’s approach to the challenges of human identity. 
601 |a Challenger 
650 4 |a Adorno 
650 4 |a Kierkegaard 
650 4 |a Theunissen 
650 4 |a Bias 
650 4 |a Freedom 
650 4 |a Identity 
650 4 |a Intersectionality 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 13(2022), 5, Artikel-ID 466  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:13  |g year:2022  |g number:5  |g elocationid:466 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/5/466/pdf?version=1653526231  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13050466  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/5/466  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 13  |j 2022  |e 5  |i 466 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4154266160 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1807456838 
LOK |0 005 20220622132133 
LOK |0 008 220622||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Test bias 
STB 0 0 |a Biais (distorsion) 
STC 0 0 |a Sesgo 
STG 0 0 |a Viés 
STH 0 0 |a Предвзятость 
STI 0 0 |a Μεροληψία 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Verzerrung