Challenging Identity: Kierkegaard, Bias, and Intersectionality
Kierkegaard was deeply biased and his philosophy is marred by these biases. The argument of this article is that we need to address Kierkegaard’s biases in order to bring out the relevance of his work on human identity in the 21st century. Rather than investigate a specific biased topic, I want to a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
MDPI
2022
|
In: |
Religions
Year: 2022, Volume: 13, Issue: 5 |
Further subjects: | B
Theunissen
B Kierkegaard B Adorno B Intersectionality B Identity B Test bias B Freedom |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1807456838 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220622141201.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220622s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel13050466 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1807456838 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1807456838 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1041401698 |0 (DE-627)76708974X |0 (DE-576)393080005 |4 aut |a Rosfort, René |d 1975- | |
109 | |a Rosfort, René 1975- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Challenging Identity: Kierkegaard, Bias, and Intersectionality |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Kierkegaard was deeply biased and his philosophy is marred by these biases. The argument of this article is that we need to address Kierkegaard’s biases in order to bring out the relevance of his work on human identity in the 21st century. Rather than investigate a specific biased topic, I want to articulate the way in which Kierkegaard’s biases present a serious problem for his account of identity, in particular with regard to his concepts of eternity and freedom. I spend the first part of this article examining problems in Kierkegaard’s approach to identity before turning to the strengths of his work in the second part. I use Theodor W. Adorno’s critique of Kierkegaard and Michael Theunissen’s development of this critique to bring out both the weaknesses and the strengths of Kierkegaard’s approach to the challenges of human identity. | ||
601 | |a Challenger | ||
650 | 4 | |a Adorno | |
650 | 4 | |a Kierkegaard | |
650 | 4 | |a Theunissen | |
650 | 4 | |a Bias | |
650 | 4 | |a Freedom | |
650 | 4 | |a Identity | |
650 | 4 | |a Intersectionality | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 13(2022), 5, Artikel-ID 466 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2022 |g number:5 |g elocationid:466 |
856 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/5/466/pdf?version=1653526231 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13050466 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/5/466 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
936 | u | w | |d 13 |j 2022 |e 5 |i 466 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4154266160 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1807456838 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220622132133 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220622||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Test bias |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Biais (distorsion) |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Sesgo |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Viés |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Предвзятость |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Μεροληψία |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Verzerrung |