On Condemning Whom We Do Not Know: Confession of Sins, Plea Bargains and Apophatic Anthropology

This essay claims that the American plea bargain, figured as an inheritor of Christian confession practices, constructs racialized criminal subjects. It further argues that an apophatic anthropology confounds this legal practice and enables new forms of confession to be imagined. The first section u...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Bragg, Hunter (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group 2022
Dans: Political theology
Année: 2022, Volume: 23, Numéro: 4, Pages: 317-334
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B USA / Verständigungsverfahren / Confession / Racisme
RelBib Classification:KBQ Amérique du Nord
NBE Anthropologie
RG Aide spirituelle; pastorale
VA Philosophie
XA Droit
Sujets non-standardisés:B apophatic theology
B Confession
B Judith Butler
B Michel Foucault
B Subjectivity
B prison abolition
B Plea Bargain
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:This essay claims that the American plea bargain, figured as an inheritor of Christian confession practices, constructs racialized criminal subjects. It further argues that an apophatic anthropology confounds this legal practice and enables new forms of confession to be imagined. The first section utilizes Michel Foucault’s genealogies of confession in order to show that shifts in European religious and legal confession practices contributed to the emergence of the modern self-possessed subject. The second section utilizes Nicole Gonzalez Van Cleve’s sociological account of the courthouse to highlight the role of the plea bargain in constructing racialized criminal subjects. The third section challenges the underlying anthropological assumptions of the plea bargaining. Drawing on Judith Butler, Catherine Keller, and Critical Race Theorists, it insists that an apophatic anthropology prevents the construction of racialized criminal subjects through plea bargains. The final section mobilizes this apophatic anthropology to envision new confession practices in abolitionist settings.
ISSN:1743-1719
Contient:Enthalten in: Political theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2022.2064096