Evolutionary Theory and Group Selection: The Question of Warfare

Evolutionary anthropology has focused on the origins of war, or rather ethnocentricity, because it epitomizes the problem of group selection, and because war may itself have been the main agent of group selection. The neo-Darwinian synthesis in biology has explained how ethnocentricity might evolve...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dawson, Doyne (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley 1999
In: History and theory
Year: 1999, Volume: 38, Issue: 4, Pages: 79-100
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1807577783
003 DE-627
005 20220624144356.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220623s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/0018-2656.00105  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1807577783 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1807577783 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Dawson, Doyne  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Evolutionary Theory and Group Selection  |b The Question of Warfare 
264 1 |c 1999 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Evolutionary anthropology has focused on the origins of war, or rather ethnocentricity, because it epitomizes the problem of group selection, and because war may itself have been the main agent of group selection. The neo-Darwinian synthesis in biology has explained how ethnocentricity might evolve by group selection, and the distinction between evoked culture and adopted culture, suggested by the emerging synthesis in evolutionary psychology, has explained how it might be transmitted. Ethnocentric mechanisms could have evolved by genetic selection in ancestral hominids, or through the interaction of genetic and cultural selection in modern humans, or both. The existence of similar behaviors in chimpanzees and the parallel development of early human societies around the globe are arguments for such inherited mechanisms. There may have been some adaptive breakthroughs in purely cultural evolution, but this process does not seem likely to produce long-term Darwinian adaptations because of the prolificity of cultural traits. Warfare may once have been a major agent of group selection, but the rates of extinction among human groups are so slow as to render this improbable since the rise of state-level societies, whose warfare tends to become a cyclical balance-of-power situation. Perhaps the most serious implication of current evolutionary thought is that the individualistic model of culture common in the social sciences and humanities is outmoded, and should be replaced by a new model that recognizes the organismic nature of human societies. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t History and theory  |d Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1960  |g 38(1999), 4, Seite 79-100  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271597585  |w (DE-600)1480747-6  |w (DE-576)07870815X  |x 1468-2303  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:38  |g year:1999  |g number:4  |g pages:79-100 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/0018-2656.00105  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/0018-2656.00105  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4155341298 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1807577783 
LOK |0 005 20220623145140 
LOK |0 008 220623||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL