Supernatural Resurrection and its Incompatibility with the Standard Model of Particle Physics: Second Rejoinder to Stephen T. Davis

In response to Stephen Davis’s criticism of our previous essay, we revisit and defend our arguments that the Resurrection hypothesis is logically incompatible with the Standard Model of particle physics—and thus is maximally implausible—and that it cannot explain the sensory experiences of the Risen...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Cavin, Robert Greg (Author) ; Colombetti, Carlos A. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wipf and Stock Publishers 2021
In: Socio-historical examination of religion and ministry
Year: 2021, Volume: 3, Issue: 2, Pages: 253-277
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1808784219
003 DE-627
005 20220701123658.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220701s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.33929/sherm.2021.vol3.no2.04  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1808784219 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1808784219 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1069542296  |0 (DE-627)821988433  |0 (DE-576)429240252  |4 aut  |a Cavin, Robert Greg 
109 |a Cavin, Robert Greg  |a Cavin, Robert G. 
245 1 0 |a Supernatural Resurrection and its Incompatibility with the Standard Model of Particle Physics: Second Rejoinder to Stephen T. Davis 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In response to Stephen Davis’s criticism of our previous essay, we revisit and defend our arguments that the Resurrection hypothesis is logically incompatible with the Standard Model of particle physics—and thus is maximally implausible—and that it cannot explain the sensory experiences of the Risen Jesus attributed to various witnesses in the New Testament—and thus has low explanatory power. We also review Davis’s reply, noting that he evades our arguments, misstates their conclusions, and distracts the reader with irrelevancies regarding, e.g., what natural laws are, what a miracle is, and how "naturalism" and "supernaturalism" differ as worldviews. Contrary to what Davis claims (even in his abstract), we do not argue that "if the Standard Model of particle physics (SM) is true, then the resurrection of Jesus did not occur and physical things can only causally interact with other physical things." Davis distorts our claims and criticizes straw men of his own creation. 
601 |a Supernatural 
601 |a Resurrection 
601 |a Davis, Stephen T. 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1069542679  |0 (DE-627)82198926X  |0 (DE-576)429240643  |4 aut  |a Colombetti, Carlos A. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Socio-historical examination of religion and ministry  |d Eugene, OR : Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2019  |g 3(2021), 2, Seite 253-277  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1699151458  |w (DE-600)3024742-1  |x 2637-7500  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:3  |g year:2021  |g number:2  |g pages:253-277 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.33929/sherm.2021.vol3.no2.04  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.shermjournal.org/articles/supernatural-resurrection-and-its-incompatibility-with-the-standard-model-of-particle-physics  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4160034845 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1808784219 
LOK |0 005 20220701123444 
LOK |0 008 220701||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL