A Response to Haynes
Haynes' (this issue) engagement with a Winnicottian redescription of Christian spiritual direction relationships and critique of some of Hardy's (this issue) claims are reframed in terms of: methodological differences between the psychology of religion and theological integration of psycho...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage Publishing
2000
|
In: |
Journal of psychology and theology
Year: 2000, Volume: 28, Issue: 4, Pages: 280-281 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
Summary: | Haynes' (this issue) engagement with a Winnicottian redescription of Christian spiritual direction relationships and critique of some of Hardy's (this issue) claims are reframed in terms of: methodological differences between the psychology of religion and theological integration of psychology, and theological differences regarding the nature of human-divine interaction. A justification is offered for including transference-countertransference issues in discussions of the role of spiritual directors. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2328-1162 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of psychology and theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/009164710002800406 |