Comments on Articles by Nelson, Slife, Reber, and Richardson
I have only tried to deepen our understanding of the issues surrounding the secular assumptions of much current psychology by doing four things: One, pointing out how the drive toward secularism or naturalism in psychological method is supported upon much broader assumptions about cognitive authorit...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage Publishing
2006
|
| In: |
Journal of psychology and theology
Year: 2006, Volume: 34, Issue: 3, Pages: 266-271 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1809024927 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220704090315.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220704s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/009164710603400309 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1809024927 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1809024927 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Willard, Dallas |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comments on Articles by Nelson, Slife, Reber, and Richardson |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2006 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a I have only tried to deepen our understanding of the issues surrounding the secular assumptions of much current psychology by doing four things: One, pointing out how the drive toward secularism or naturalism in psychological method is supported upon much broader assumptions about cognitive authority in our intellectual culture; Two, explaining a concept of knowledge that does not start from biases about possible subject matters or methods; Three, discussing some ways in which a “hermeneutical” approach in psychological method needs to be strengthened; Four, clarifying some ways in which misunderstandings and ambiguities of “objective” and “subjective” can lead to confusions about the possibilities of a psychological method that does not assume secularism. My intent is to be supportive of the intellectual thrusts developed in the articles. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of psychology and theology |d London : Sage Publishing, 1973 |g 34(2006), 3, Seite 266-271 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341346381 |w (DE-600)2067352-8 |w (DE-576)273869256 |x 2328-1162 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:34 |g year:2006 |g number:3 |g pages:266-271 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1645598802 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/009164710603400309 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4160915353 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1809024927 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220704090315 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220704||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-06-22#F2F9704800D1A4301D7916478855D6CE16439787 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||