Intellectual Humility and Reactions to Opinions about Religious Beliefs

Intellectual humility, a recognition of the fallibility of one's own views and an openness to changing those views when warranted, is a construct with roots in philosophy that is only now beginning to receive attention from psychological scientists. We focus on intellectual humility in the doma...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Hopkin, Cameron R. (Author) ; Hoyle, Rick H. (Author) ; Toner, Kaitlin (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage Publishing 2014
In: Journal of psychology and theology
Year: 2014, Volume: 42, Issue: 1, Pages: 50-61
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1809027764
003 DE-627
005 20220704090322.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220704s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/009164711404200106  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1809027764 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1809027764 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hopkin, Cameron R.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Hopkin, Cameron R. 
245 1 0 |a Intellectual Humility and Reactions to Opinions about Religious Beliefs 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Intellectual humility, a recognition of the fallibility of one's own views and an openness to changing those views when warranted, is a construct with roots in philosophy that is only now beginning to receive attention from psychological scientists. We focus on intellectual humility in the domain of religious belief and conduct an initial test of the hypothesis that the influence of religious beliefs on evaluations of written opinions about religious matters is moderated by intellectual humility. We find that our ad hoc measure of intellectual humility in the religious domain is best characterized in terms of four correlated dimensions, allowing for focused tests of our hypothesis. We find some support for the hypothesis. Individuals with strong religious beliefs who are low in intellectual humility in the religion domain, regardless of dimension, react more strongly than their high humility counterparts to written opinions regarding religious beliefs—both opinions that support and contradict their own beliefs. Ancillary analyses show a moderate curvilinear relation between strength of religious beliefs and intellectual humility in the religion domain, with lower humility accompanying stronger views in favor of and against religious beliefs. 
700 1 |a Hoyle, Rick H.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Toner, Kaitlin  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of psychology and theology  |d London : Sage Publishing, 1973  |g 42(2014), 1, Seite 50-61  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341346381  |w (DE-600)2067352-8  |w (DE-576)273869256  |x 2328-1162  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:42  |g year:2014  |g number:1  |g pages:50-61 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1640064370  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/009164711404200106  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4160918239 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1809027764 
LOK |0 005 20220704090322 
LOK |0 008 220704||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-06-22#D89C97391A7FFCF8DAC356F0ACFE80E25B0BF417 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL