Apples or Oranges—Does the Fruit Remain? A Response to Rosik (2017)
In Rosik's (2017) response to my previous article (Jensma, 2016), he indicates that I made an unfortunate comparison between his earlier study (Rosik, 2011) and the outcome study in my article. I agree that such a comparison would be “apples and oranges”—as he calls it—and inappropriate. Howeve...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage Publishing
2017
|
In: |
Journal of psychology and theology
Year: 2017, Volume: 45, Issue: 3, Pages: 237-241 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1809028949 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220704090325.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220704s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/009164711704500307 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1809028949 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1809028949 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Jensma, Jeanne L. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Apples or Oranges—Does the Fruit Remain? A Response to Rosik (2017) |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In Rosik's (2017) response to my previous article (Jensma, 2016), he indicates that I made an unfortunate comparison between his earlier study (Rosik, 2011) and the outcome study in my article. I agree that such a comparison would be “apples and oranges”—as he calls it—and inappropriate. However, such a comparison was not intended, although I can see how it might have been inferred. My article presented the findings of an outcome study done at ALONGSIDE, a center that offers an intensive outpatient program primarily for missionaries. My literature review brought Rosik's (2011) outcome study to the fore, and the results of my outcome study appeared to be inconsistent with one of the primary findings suggested by Rosik's study. Responsible scholarship required me to try to explain the apparent difference in findings, but this was not the point of the article, and the article was not intended to be a comparison between the two studies. Rosik's re-analysis of his data indicates that both studies in fact showed similar results at three-month follow-up, and my presentation of further data in this response indicates that the results of a one-year follow-up are similar to the results of the three-month follow-up, thus supporting the findings of the outcome study presented in my previous article. | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of psychology and theology |d London : Sage Publishing, 1973 |g 45(2017), 3, Seite 237-241 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341346381 |w (DE-600)2067352-8 |w (DE-576)273869256 |x 2328-1162 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:45 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g pages:237-241 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1566026725 |k Non-Electronic | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/009164711704500307 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 416091943X | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1809028949 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220704090325 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220704||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-06-22#075B97BCF336481BA132A776E70527557E9C5CA1 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |