Apples or Oranges—Does the Fruit Remain? A Response to Rosik (2017)

In Rosik's (2017) response to my previous article (Jensma, 2016), he indicates that I made an unfortunate comparison between his earlier study (Rosik, 2011) and the outcome study in my article. I agree that such a comparison would be “apples and oranges”—as he calls it—and inappropriate. Howeve...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jensma, Jeanne L. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage Publishing 2017
In: Journal of psychology and theology
Year: 2017, Volume: 45, Issue: 3, Pages: 237-241
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1809028949
003 DE-627
005 20220704090325.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220704s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/009164711704500307  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1809028949 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1809028949 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Jensma, Jeanne L.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Apples or Oranges—Does the Fruit Remain? A Response to Rosik (2017) 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In Rosik's (2017) response to my previous article (Jensma, 2016), he indicates that I made an unfortunate comparison between his earlier study (Rosik, 2011) and the outcome study in my article. I agree that such a comparison would be “apples and oranges”—as he calls it—and inappropriate. However, such a comparison was not intended, although I can see how it might have been inferred. My article presented the findings of an outcome study done at ALONGSIDE, a center that offers an intensive outpatient program primarily for missionaries. My literature review brought Rosik's (2011) outcome study to the fore, and the results of my outcome study appeared to be inconsistent with one of the primary findings suggested by Rosik's study. Responsible scholarship required me to try to explain the apparent difference in findings, but this was not the point of the article, and the article was not intended to be a comparison between the two studies. Rosik's re-analysis of his data indicates that both studies in fact showed similar results at three-month follow-up, and my presentation of further data in this response indicates that the results of a one-year follow-up are similar to the results of the three-month follow-up, thus supporting the findings of the outcome study presented in my previous article. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of psychology and theology  |d London : Sage Publishing, 1973  |g 45(2017), 3, Seite 237-241  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341346381  |w (DE-600)2067352-8  |w (DE-576)273869256  |x 2328-1162  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:45  |g year:2017  |g number:3  |g pages:237-241 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1566026725  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/009164711704500307  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 45  |j 2017  |e 3  |h 237-241 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 416091943X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1809028949 
LOK |0 005 20220704090325 
LOK |0 008 220704||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-06-22#075B97BCF336481BA132A776E70527557E9C5CA1 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL