Charles Taylor and the Invention of Modern Inwardness: A Sufi, Constructive Response
Philosophers such as Charles Taylor have claimed that selfhood is a distinctly modern phenomenon, associated with inwardness, inner depths, and creativity. In this conception, selfhood is defined in terms of “radical reflexivity”, which saw its emergence with the likes of Descartes. Thus, according...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
MDPI
2022
|
In: |
Religions
Year: 2022, Volume: 13, Issue: 8 |
Further subjects: | B
Charles Taylor
B Inwardness B bewilderment B Self B radical reflexivity B Sufism B inner depths |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1811955797 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220729055853.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220729s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel13080674 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1811955797 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1811955797 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1246703998 |0 (DE-627)1779762429 |4 aut |a Faruque, Muhammad U. | |
109 | |a Faruque, Muhammad U. |a Faruque, Muhammad Umar | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Charles Taylor and the Invention of Modern Inwardness: A Sufi, Constructive Response |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Philosophers such as Charles Taylor have claimed that selfhood is a distinctly modern phenomenon, associated with inwardness, inner depths, and creativity. In this conception, selfhood is defined in terms of “radical reflexivity”, which saw its emergence with the likes of Descartes. Thus, according to Taylor, it is only with modern people that we see the appearance of selfhood and subjectivity, whereas premoderns did not have a notion of the self, because they lacked the essential conceptions of inwardness and reflexivity. The purpose of this article is to challenge and overturn the above thesis by presenting how various historical Sufi–Islamic authors placed “inwardness and reflexivity” at the center of their conceptions of the self, while emphasizing its ambivalent nature. | ||
650 | 4 | |a bewilderment | |
650 | 4 | |a Self | |
650 | 4 | |a inner depths | |
650 | 4 | |a Inwardness | |
650 | 4 | |a radical reflexivity | |
650 | 4 | |a Sufism | |
650 | 4 | |a Charles Taylor | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 13(2022), 8, Artikel-ID 674 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2022 |g number:8 |g elocationid:674 |
856 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/8/674/pdf?version=1658717376 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13080674 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/8/674 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4173659350 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1811955797 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220729052605 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220729||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-07-28#0F179132276962D38824F04441852F260B1A1AD1 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |