Is Dharmapāla Criticizing Bhāviveka in the Cheng weishi lun? Silla Yogācāra Master Taehyŏn’s Views on the Dispute between Emptiness and Existence
The Cheng weishi lun 成唯識論 (*Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi-śāstra), a compiled translation of Indian commentaries on Vasubandhu’s (ca. fourth or fifth centuries CE) Triṃśikā, centering on Dharmapāla’s (ca. sixth century) exegesis, is well known as the foundational text that offers the doctrinal basis of the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Hawai'i Press
2020
|
| In: |
Journal of Korean religions
Year: 2020, Volume: 11, Issue: 1, Pages: 45-70 |
| Further subjects: | B
amalavijñāna
B Yogācāra B Dharmapāla B Bhāviveka (ca. 500–570) B Taehyŏn 大賢 B Madhyamaka B Cheng weishi lun 成唯識論 (*Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi-śāstra) |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 181242079X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220730054132.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220730s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1353/jkr.2020.0001 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)181242079X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP181242079X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lee, Sumi |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is Dharmapāla Criticizing Bhāviveka in the Cheng weishi lun? Silla Yogācāra Master Taehyŏn’s Views on the Dispute between Emptiness and Existence |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The Cheng weishi lun 成唯識論 (*Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi-śāstra), a compiled translation of Indian commentaries on Vasubandhu’s (ca. fourth or fifth centuries CE) Triṃśikā, centering on Dharmapāla’s (ca. sixth century) exegesis, is well known as the foundational text that offers the doctrinal basis of the East Asian Yogācāra school—the Dharma Characteristics school (Ch. Faxiang zong, K. Pŏpsang chong, J. Hossōshū 法相宗). In his commentary to the Cheng weishi lun, Kuiji 窺基 (632–682), the de facto founder of the Dharma Characteristics school, considers Dharmapāla’s criticism in the Cheng weishi lun toward those adhering to “emptiness” as aimed at such a Madhyamaka scholiast as Bhāviveka (ca. 500–570). Kuiji’s interpretation has tended to be generally accepted under the backdrop of the contemporary controversy revolving around the distinct doctrinal views between Dharmapāla and Bhāviveka. However, just as the question of whether Madhyamaka and Yogācāra over the long history of Mahāyāna Buddhism were philosophically consistent with each other cannot find an easy answer, we cannot simply conclude based on the “orthodox” explanation that these two scholiasts were doctrinally antagonistic. Indeed, the Silla Yogācāra monk Taehyŏn 大賢 (ca. eighth century) introduced three distinct interpretations by contemporary scholar monks on this matter. This paper examines East Asian commentators’ interpretations on the relationship between Dharmapāla and Bhāviveka as presented in Taehyŏn’s commentary of the Cheng weishi lun, and further discusses how Taehyŏn explains doctrinal conflict between the seemingly contrasting notions, such as ‘the conditioned’ (saṃskāra) and ‘the unconditioned’ (asaṃskāra), by observing his interpretation of such a concept of ‘the immaculate consciousness’ (amalavijñāna). | ||
| 601 | |a Dharmapāla | ||
| 601 | |a Yogācāra | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a amalavijñāna | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Taehyŏn 大賢 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bhāviveka (ca. 500–570) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dharmapāla | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cheng weishi lun 成唯識論 (*Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi-śāstra) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Yogācāra | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Madhyamaka | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of Korean religions |d Honolulu, Hawaii : University of Hawai'i Press, 2010 |g 11(2020), 1, Seite 45-70 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)696793393 |w (DE-600)2659474-2 |w (DE-576)398102066 |x 2167-2040 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g pages:45-70 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/26975914 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1353/jkr.2020.0001 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://muse.jhu.edu/article/757395 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4174423288 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 181242079X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220730054132 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220730||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-07-03#16C668FC2F97A3CFF6AAF7F3DD0E8DF9B610E072 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/26975914 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Yogācāra,Yogachara School,Vijñaptimātratā |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Yogācāra,Yogâcâra,Yogâcâra |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Yogacara |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Yogācāra,Vijnanavada,Vijnanavada |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 瑜伽行派,唯识宗,唯识派 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 瑜伽行派,唯識宗,唯識派 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Ioga |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Йогачара |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Γιογκακάρα,Yogācāra |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Yogācāra-Schule,Jogatschara-Schule,Yogācārya,Yogāchārya,Yogāchāra,Vijñānavāda,Mind-only-School,Nur-Bewußtseinsschule,Vijñaptimātratā,Vijñaptimātra |