Religious Belonging and the Multiple

Feminist engagement with resources from the world’s religious traditions has sometimes been criticized, but it has not yet been theorized in light of the phenomenon of multiple religious belonging. In order to discern why theologians have had difficulty accommodating data from popular practice and f...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roberts, Michelle Voss (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Indiana University Press 2010
In: Journal of feminist studies in religion
Year: 2010, Volume: 26, Issue: 1, Pages: 43-62
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1812880618
003 DE-627
005 20220803052913.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220803s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1812880618 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1812880618 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Roberts, Michelle Voss  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Religious Belonging and the Multiple 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Feminist engagement with resources from the world’s religious traditions has sometimes been criticized, but it has not yet been theorized in light of the phenomenon of multiple religious belonging. In order to discern why theologians have had difficulty accommodating data from popular practice and from the margins of religious traditions, Voss Roberts destabilizes each of the three terms of “multiple religious belonging.” She finds that modern definitions of religion are partly responsible for perceptions of multiple commitments as problematic, and that the metaphor of belonging obscures important dynamics of religious identity. This article proposes that the major difficulty with the theories, however, lies in the absence of a serious attempt to theorize the multiple. Voss Roberts thus offers alternative metaphors that more adequately capture the religious experience of feminists in relation to religious traditions. 
601 |a Multiple 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of feminist studies in religion  |d Bloomington, Ind. : Indiana University Press, 1985  |g 26(2010), 1, Seite 43-62  |w (DE-627)341911747  |w (DE-600)2070958-4  |w (DE-576)266819427  |x 1553-3913  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:26  |g year:2010  |g number:1  |g pages:43-62 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1647033837  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/fsr.2010.26.1.43  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://muse.jhu.edu/article/381898  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 26  |j 2010  |e 1  |h 43-62 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4175263748 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1812880618 
LOK |0 005 20220803052913 
LOK |0 008 220803||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-07-08#386018314E20660EB50CC433BB2DFB1C7B7D4C02 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/fsr.2010.26.1.43 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL