On Whether There Are Grounds for Worship
I explore a novel defense of the duty to worship God based on the idea that it is what’s best for us. I argue that this should be understood as the claim that humans are required to do what’s best when (a) there is a best option available; (b) the best option is identifiable; and (c) the best option...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch/Druck Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
EPS
2021
|
| In: |
Philosophia Christi
Jahr: 2021, Band: 23, Heft: 2, Seiten: 313-327 |
| RelBib Classification: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | I explore a novel defense of the duty to worship God based on the idea that it is what’s best for us. I argue that this should be understood as the claim that humans are required to do what’s best when (a) there is a best option available; (b) the best option is identifiable; and (c) the best option is feasible. One virtue of this account is that it can explain how a duty to worship God is defeasible. I show this by appealing to a recent concept developed by Chris Tucker called motivated submaximization. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1529-1634 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Philosophia Christi
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/pc202123226 |