Feminising Faith: A Reflection on Personal and Academic Journeys

Written in response to the conference organisers’ explicit invitation, this paper combines personalised reflection on a scholarly journey with a broader historiographical overview. The 1970s seemed unpropitious times for researching women of faith in South Africa. Neo-Marxist concerns with...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gaitskell, D. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: ASRSA 2010
In: Journal for the study of religion
Year: 2010, Volume: 23, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 71-104
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 181448941X
003 DE-627
005 20220817052702.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220817s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.4314/jsr.v23i1-2.69794  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)181448941X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP181448941X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Gaitskell, D.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Feminising Faith: A Reflection on Personal and Academic Journeys 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Written in response to the conference organisers’ explicit invitation, this paper combines personalised reflection on a scholarly journey with a broader historiographical overview. The 1970s seemed unpropitious times for researching women of faith in South Africa. Neo-Marxist concerns with rural political economy and urban workers’ struggles with capital gave little space or validity to female spirituality in the mission encounter. What wider perspectives, changing trends and scholarly networks over the ensuing decades have sustained my own research and that of others in related fields? First, anthropology threw light on African religious and social developments, while historians like Richard Gray focused on African Christian agency. By the 1980s, feminist analyses and a new social history were enriching South African scholarship. In the 1990s, the Comaroffs gave mission history fresh cachet, while others – often at odds with them – developed new academic collaborations on Christianity. Meanwhile, gender research and advocacy acquired a higher profile in South Africa’s nascent democracy. Further advances after 2000 suggest that both mission history and female religiosity – certainly from a UK perspective – now have a much stronger standing in the academy. 
520 |a Written in response to the conference organisers’ explicit invitation, this paper combines personalised reflection on a scholarly journey with a broader historiographical overview. The 1970s seemed unpropitious times for researching women of faith in South Africa. Neo-Marxist concerns with rural political economy and urban workers’ struggles with capital gave little space or validity to female spirituality in the mission encounter. What wider perspectives, changing trends and scholarly networks over the ensuing decades have sustained my own research and that of others in related fields? First, anthropology threw light on African religious and social developments, while historians like Richard Gray focused on African Christian agency. By the 1980s, feminist analyses and a new social history were enriching South African scholarship. In the 1990s, the Comaroffs gave mission history fresh cachet, while others – often at odds with them – developed new academic collaborations on Christianity. Meanwhile, gender research and advocacy acquired a higher profile in South Africa’s nascent democracy. Further advances after 2000 suggest that both mission history and female religiosity – certainly from a UK perspective – now have a much stronger standing in the academy. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal for the study of religion  |d [Pretoria] : ASRSA, 1988  |g 23(2010), 1/2, Seite 71-104  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)618332448  |w (DE-600)2536916-7  |w (DE-576)477530001  |x 2413-3027  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:23  |g year:2010  |g number:1/2  |g pages:71-104 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24763998  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.4314/jsr.v23i1-2.69794  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsr/article/view/69794  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4179918056 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 181448941X 
LOK |0 005 20220817052702 
LOK |0 008 220817||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-07-20#7B9EA2E3170F52C3F9649116E0EB4324BCC9CAD6 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24763998 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL