Challenging the Idea of Divine Omnipotence: Jewish Voices and a Christian Response

It is a widespread assumption that among Jews, as also among Christians and Muslims, omnipotence is considered one of God's essential attributes. Many people also assume that the idea of divine suffering is a non-Jewish idea, but many Jews, including prominent philosophers and theologians, have...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Merkle, John C. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Pennsylvania Press 2022
In: Journal of ecumenical studies
Year: 2022, Volume: 57, Issue: 3, Pages: 411-431
RelBib Classification:AX Inter-religious relations
BH Judaism
CA Christianity
Further subjects:B Christian Theology
B Jewish Theology
B Abraham Joshua Heschel
B Edward Feld
B Jürgen Moltmann
B divine omnipotence
B Suffering
B Hans Jonas
B Melissa Raphael
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1815162740
003 DE-627
005 20230322142955.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220825s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1353/ecu.2022.0033  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1815162740 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1815162740 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Merkle, John C.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Merkle, John C. 
245 1 0 |a Challenging the Idea of Divine Omnipotence: Jewish Voices and a Christian Response 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a It is a widespread assumption that among Jews, as also among Christians and Muslims, omnipotence is considered one of God's essential attributes. Many people also assume that the idea of divine suffering is a non-Jewish idea, but many Jews, including prominent philosophers and theologians, have challenged the idea of divine omnipotence, and many have spoken of God's suffering along with God's creatures and of needing help to redeem creation. In the first part of this essay, I focus on four Jewish religious thinkers—Abraham Joshua Heschel, Hans Jonas, Edward Feld, and Melissa Raphael—for whom the idea of divine omnipotence is problematic, three of whom espouse the idea of divine suffering, and each of whom speaks of redemption as a collaborative task between God and human beings. In the second part of the essay, I begin by noting that many Christians are surprised to hear that Jews speak of the suffering of God, assuming that this is more of a Christian thing to do because of the suffering of Christ whom they believe to be God incarnate. I suggest that many Christians would likely agree with renowned Protestant theologian Jürgen Moltmann that "we can only talk about God's suffering in trinitarian terms" or they assume that talk about God's suffering must be related to the doctrine of the Incarnation. After pointing out that classical Christian theology actually rejects the idea of divine suffering and arguing that taking the Incarnation seriously should compel us to be open to insights about God that are not tied to Christian doctrines, I offer my own appreciation of the previously summarized insights of Heschel, Jonas, Feld, and Raphael. In the process, I suggest how their insights about God's limited power, God's suffering, and God's need of human help in redeeming the world, which at first may seem to conflict with traditional Christian views, can have a positive effect on Christian ways of relating to God and in formulating more realistic and thus more tenable views of God. 
601 |a Challenger 
650 4 |a divine omnipotence 
650 4 |a Suffering 
650 4 |a Christian Theology 
650 4 |a Jewish Theology 
650 4 |a Melissa Raphael 
650 4 |a Edward Feld 
650 4 |a Hans Jonas 
650 4 |a Abraham Joshua Heschel 
650 4 |a Jürgen Moltmann 
652 |a AX:BH:CA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of ecumenical studies  |d Philadelphia, PA : University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990  |g 57(2022), 3, Seite 411-431  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341338702  |w (DE-600)2066576-3  |w (DE-576)273868209  |x 2162-3937  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:57  |g year:2022  |g number:3  |g pages:411-431 
856 4 0 |u https://muse.jhu.edu/article/862936  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1353/ecu.2022.0033  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4182609476 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1815162740 
LOK |0 005 20220909103250 
LOK |0 008 220825||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-24#E3E7192915268D2E3CFE55985B359E1B75E07DC0 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043520  |a BH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043741  |a CA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043253  |a AX 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL