Origen, Greek Philosophy, and the Birth of the Trinitarian Meaning of Hypostasis

Origen, far from being a precursor of “Arianism,” as he was depicted during the Origenist controversy and is often still misrepresented today, was the main inspirer of the Nicene-Cappadocian line.1 The Trinitarian formulation of this line, which was represented above all by Gregory of Nyssa, is that...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ramelli, Ilaria L. E. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2012
In: Harvard theological review
Year: 2012, Volume: 105, Issue: 3, Pages: 302-350
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1817624180
003 DE-627
005 20220928142052.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220928s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0017816012000120  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1817624180 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1817624180 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Ramelli, Ilaria L. E.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Origen, Greek Philosophy, and the Birth of the Trinitarian Meaning of Hypostasis 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Origen, far from being a precursor of “Arianism,” as he was depicted during the Origenist controversy and is often still misrepresented today, was the main inspirer of the Nicene-Cappadocian line.1 The Trinitarian formulation of this line, which was represented above all by Gregory of Nyssa, is that God is one and the same nature or essence in three individual substances and that the Son is to the Father. Indeed, the three members of the Trinity share in the same 2 This formulation was followed by Basil in his last phase; Didymus, Gregory of Nazianzus from 362 onwards; Evagrius; and numerous later authors.3 Origen himself had already maintained both things: that the Father, the Son, and the Spirit have the same but are three different and Gregory of Nyssa closely followed him.4 As I set out to argue, Origen’s thought represented a novel and fundamental theorization with respect to the communality of and the individuality of conceived as individual substances, in the Trinity. He influenced not only subsequent Trinitarian theology, but perhaps even “pagan” Neoplatonism. (Likewise, on the christological side, Annewies van den Hoek5 has insightfully demonstrated the importance of Origen in asking—and endeavoring to answer—the question of the unification of humanity and divinity in Christ, and Origen’s influence on later formulations.) 
601 |a Philosophie 
601 |a hypostasis 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Harvard theological review  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1908  |g 105(2012), 3, Seite 302-350  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)331504553  |w (DE-600)2051494-3  |w (DE-576)094533326  |x 1475-4517  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:105  |g year:2012  |g number:3  |g pages:302-350 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646274164  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/23327679  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816012000120  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/origen-greek-philosophy-and-the-birth-of-the-trinitarian-meaning-of-hypostasis/E153AE9316761D6839E8D07632CF5333  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 105  |j 2012  |e 3  |h 302-350 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192568071 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1817624180 
LOK |0 005 20220928052625 
LOK |0 008 220928||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-27#E2AD2FC9757179B17C519E4F8C71476283E813A6 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/23327679 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a BIB  |a REL