Religious Nationalism and Democratic Polity: The Indian Case

It is argued in this article that religious nationalism and democracy are antithetical in their orientation. There are several reasons for this. First, nationhood based on religion assumes a necessary conterminality between religion and territory. While in the case of proselytizing religions (e.g.,...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oommen, T. K. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford Univ. Press 1994
In: Sociology of religion
Year: 1994, Volume: 55, Issue: 4, Pages: 455-472
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1819417441
003 DE-627
005 20221020053003.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221020s1994 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/3711982  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1819417441 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1819417441 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Oommen, T. K.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Religious Nationalism and Democratic Polity: The Indian Case 
264 1 |c 1994 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a It is argued in this article that religious nationalism and democracy are antithetical in their orientation. There are several reasons for this. First, nationhood based on religion assumes a necessary conterminality between religion and territory. While in the case of proselytizing religions (e.g., Buddhism, Christianity and Islam) such an assumption is patently contradictory, even in the case of nonproselytizing religions (e.g., Hinduism, Judaism) religion-territory linkages are often blurred through conquest, colonization, and migration. Second, once territorialization becomes the domain assumption of a religion, a process of homogenization of the culture of the territory and the consequent hegemonization by the dominant religious collectivity often becomes its necessary ideological tenet. Third, this ideology calls for the praxis of “communalization” of politics and “relativization” of culture, all of which have disastrous consequences for a democratic polity. The argument is pursued with special reference to India. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sociology of religion  |d Oxford : Oxford Univ. Pr., 1993  |g 55(1994), 4, Seite 455-472  |w (DE-627)341903728  |w (DE-600)2070139-1  |w (DE-576)263021270  |x 1759-8818  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:55  |g year:1994  |g number:4  |g pages:455-472 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/3711982  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3711982  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/socrel/article/55/4/455/1625794  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4199320504 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1819417441 
LOK |0 005 20221020053003 
LOK |0 008 221020||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-27#F765D3704EF60CE5617854C8671F9AE1C77398B7 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3711982 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL