Secularization from the Perspective of Globalization: A Response to Dobbelaere
The perspective of globalization often treats global social reality as a single global society. The question of secularization must therefore be addressed primarily to that society and not in the first instance to a regional or cultural subunit of it. Following Dobbelaere's three-dimensional mo...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Oxford Univ. Press
1999
|
In: |
Sociology of religion
Year: 1999, Volume: 60, Issue: 3, Pages: 289-301 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1819420310 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221020053138.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221020s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.2307/3711938 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1819420310 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1819420310 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Beyer, Peter |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Secularization from the Perspective of Globalization: A Response to Dobbelaere |
264 | 1 | |c 1999 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The perspective of globalization often treats global social reality as a single global society. The question of secularization must therefore be addressed primarily to that society and not in the first instance to a regional or cultural subunit of it. Following Dobbelaere's three-dimensional model of secularization, it is argued that world society is for the most part secularized in the dimension of “laicization,” but not in those of “religious change” or “religious involvement.” The three dimensions vary independently just as the corresponding Luhmannian types of social system, interaction, organization, and societal system do. The approach permits the analysis of regional differences without thereby having to put forward one or another of these as normative for the society as a whole. In this light, four forms of religion are analyzed for their likely dominance in global society, namely the collective cultural, the organized, the politicized, and the individualistic. The conclusion is that global society offers the most favorable conditions for the last three, but that overall the future of religion in this society is fundamentally unpredictable for social theory. | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Sociology of religion |d Oxford : Oxford Univ. Pr., 1993 |g 60(1999), 3, Seite 289-301 |w (DE-627)341903728 |w (DE-600)2070139-1 |w (DE-576)263021270 |x 1759-8818 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:60 |g year:1999 |g number:3 |g pages:289-301 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1643115030 |k Non-Electronic | ||
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/3711938 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3711938 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://academic.oup.com/socrel/article/60/3/289/1658100 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4199323376 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1819420310 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221020053138 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221020||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-27#4B4CC072F88E9EA11B581CE260BEB1D5CA07D8F6 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3711938 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |