Secularization from the Perspective of Globalization: A Response to Dobbelaere

The perspective of globalization often treats global social reality as a single global society. The question of secularization must therefore be addressed primarily to that society and not in the first instance to a regional or cultural subunit of it. Following Dobbelaere's three-dimensional mo...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Beyer, Peter (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford Univ. Press 1999
In: Sociology of religion
Year: 1999, Volume: 60, Issue: 3, Pages: 289-301
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1819420310
003 DE-627
005 20221020053138.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221020s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/3711938  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1819420310 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1819420310 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Beyer, Peter  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Secularization from the Perspective of Globalization: A Response to Dobbelaere 
264 1 |c 1999 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The perspective of globalization often treats global social reality as a single global society. The question of secularization must therefore be addressed primarily to that society and not in the first instance to a regional or cultural subunit of it. Following Dobbelaere's three-dimensional model of secularization, it is argued that world society is for the most part secularized in the dimension of “laicization,” but not in those of “religious change” or “religious involvement.” The three dimensions vary independently just as the corresponding Luhmannian types of social system, interaction, organization, and societal system do. The approach permits the analysis of regional differences without thereby having to put forward one or another of these as normative for the society as a whole. In this light, four forms of religion are analyzed for their likely dominance in global society, namely the collective cultural, the organized, the politicized, and the individualistic. The conclusion is that global society offers the most favorable conditions for the last three, but that overall the future of religion in this society is fundamentally unpredictable for social theory. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sociology of religion  |d Oxford : Oxford Univ. Pr., 1993  |g 60(1999), 3, Seite 289-301  |w (DE-627)341903728  |w (DE-600)2070139-1  |w (DE-576)263021270  |x 1759-8818  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:60  |g year:1999  |g number:3  |g pages:289-301 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1643115030  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/3711938  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3711938  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/socrel/article/60/3/289/1658100  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4199323376 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1819420310 
LOK |0 005 20221020053138 
LOK |0 008 221020||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-27#4B4CC072F88E9EA11B581CE260BEB1D5CA07D8F6 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3711938 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL