Stark's Age of Faith Argument and the Secularization of Things: A Commentary

Rodney Stark has recently argued that secularization theory stands or falls with the historical existence of an “age of faith”, which is thought to present a contrast with our present religiously-mixed situation. He presents much recent evidence that the medieval period does not fit that description...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sommerville, C. John (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford Univ. Press 2002
In: Sociology of religion
Year: 2002, Volume: 63, Issue: 3, Pages: 361-372
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1819422062
003 DE-627
005 20221020053403.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221020s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/3712474  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1819422062 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1819422062 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Sommerville, C. John  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Stark's Age of Faith Argument and the Secularization of Things: A Commentary 
264 1 |c 2002 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Rodney Stark has recently argued that secularization theory stands or falls with the historical existence of an “age of faith”, which is thought to present a contrast with our present religiously-mixed situation. He presents much recent evidence that the medieval period does not fit that description. But he misconceives the issues. First, faith is not the most natural description of medieval religion, which is better seen as religious culture. As Lucien Febvre pointed out, those populations literally could not express themselves outside of a religious idiom, unlike today. Therefore, we commonly adopt a different sense of the term “secularization” in reference to culture (things or institutions) than when referring to people (beliefs). Second, although Stark warns that in assessing religion today we must remember not to restrict ourselves to Christianity, he violates that principle in insisting on proper religion when assessing medieval society. Third, he assumes that in speaking of secularization, one must mean secularization theory. This ignores a descriptive sense used in historical scholarship. Thus, Stark is announcing the demise of the concept of secularization just when it is becoming a larger and more important problem for scholars. 
601 |a Argumentation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sociology of religion  |d Oxford : Oxford Univ. Pr., 1993  |g 63(2002), 3, Seite 361-372  |w (DE-627)341903728  |w (DE-600)2070139-1  |w (DE-576)263021270  |x 1759-8818  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:63  |g year:2002  |g number:3  |g pages:361-372 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/3712474  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3712474  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/socrel/article/63/3/361/1734603  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 63  |j 2002  |e 3  |h 361-372 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4199325174 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1819422062 
LOK |0 005 20221020053403 
LOK |0 008 221020||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-27#B24AB6982A9CAA3AD0E10B05359F9185E5ECE1A5 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3712474 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL