"No Sin to Limp": Critique as Error in Geoffrey Hartman's Essays on Midrash

This article argues that contemporary polemics against critical reading, understood as the enduring legacy of "theory" in the humanities, overlook the unusual and generative concept of critique formulated by one of the literary scholars most closely associated with "theory," the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Catlin, Samuel P. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: De Gruyter 2022
In: Naharaim
Year: 2022, Volume: 16, Issue: 1, Pages: 53-77
Further subjects:B Deconstruction
B Critique
B Freud
B Hartman
B Midrash
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1819848868
003 DE-627
005 20221025073516.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221025s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1515/naha-2022-0002  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1819848868 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1819848868 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Catlin, Samuel P.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a "No Sin to Limp"  |b Critique as Error in Geoffrey Hartman's Essays on Midrash 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article argues that contemporary polemics against critical reading, understood as the enduring legacy of "theory" in the humanities, overlook the unusual and generative concept of critique formulated by one of the literary scholars most closely associated with "theory," the German-born American literary critic Geoffrey Hartman. For Hartman, critique amounts to a thinking that exposes itself to the alterity of the future and thus risks being wrong. Engaging two of Hartman's essays from the mid-1980s, "The Struggle for the Text" and "Meaning, Error, Text," the article specifically argues that Hartman derives this concept of critique as thinking that risks error from rabbinic midrash. However, this does not mean that Hartman seeks to "do midrash" himself. To the contrary, what Hartman learns from midrash is that the very structure of linguistic repetition, citation, or imitation forecloses the possibility of absolute fidelity to tradition. In "The Struggle for the Text," he demonstrates this lesson through subversive readings of Genesis 32 and a fragment from Sigmund Freud's Beyond the Pleasure Principle ; in "Meaning, Error, Text," Hartman historicizes his hermeneutic in relation to Christian supersession and the Holocaust, claiming ethical and political significance for his "restitution" of midrash as a model of critique. 
601 |a Hartman, Geoffrey H. 
601 |a Midrash 
650 4 |a Freud 
650 4 |a Hartman 
650 4 |a Critique 
650 4 |a Deconstruction 
650 4 |a Midrash 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Naharaim  |d Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 2007  |g 16(2022), 1, Seite 53-77  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)557575192  |w (DE-600)2405121-4  |w (DE-576)278242332  |x 1862-9156  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:16  |g year:2022  |g number:1  |g pages:53-77 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/naha-2022-0002  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/naha-2022-0002/html  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4201595676 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1819848868 
LOK |0 005 20221025073516 
LOK |0 008 221025||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Midraš