Contagion in Theology and Law: Ethical Considerations in the Writings of Two 14th Century Scholars of Nasrid Granada

Abstract The Black Death, which struck al-Andalus in the second half of the 8th/14th century, was an unprecedented natural disaster. In this essay I examine the legal and ethical responses of two Granadan scholars to the social and intellectual challenge posed by this event. Whereas previous scholar...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stearns, Justin (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2007
In: Islamic law and society
Year: 2007, Volume: 14, Issue: 1, Pages: 109-129
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1820636534
003 DE-627
005 20221103052656.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221103s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/156851907780323852  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1820636534 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1820636534 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Stearns, Justin  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Contagion in Theology and Law: Ethical Considerations in the Writings of Two 14th Century Scholars of Nasrid Granada 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract The Black Death, which struck al-Andalus in the second half of the 8th/14th century, was an unprecedented natural disaster. In this essay I examine the legal and ethical responses of two Granadan scholars to the social and intellectual challenge posed by this event. Whereas previous scholarship has almost universally lauded the stridently critical stance of the wazir Ibn al-Khatīb as an exceptional example of rational empiricism, I argue that his stance is more productively understood when compared to that of his teacher Ibn Lubb. Both scholars articulated an ethical response to an insurmountable challenge from within a medical and legal framework. Their interpretive choices and conclusions were based not so much on one scholar's privileging of empirical evidence over legal dogma, or vice versa, as they were on both scholars' grounding their respective statements in differing understandings of the nature of the evidence at hand. 
601 |a Theologe 
601 |a Granada 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Islamic law and society  |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1994  |g 14(2007), 1, Seite 109-129  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)32444639X  |w (DE-600)2036948-7  |w (DE-576)099025817  |x 1568-5195  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:14  |g year:2007  |g number:1  |g pages:109-129 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40377927  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/156851907780323852  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/ils/14/1/article-p109_4.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4205887841 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1820636534 
LOK |0 005 20221103052656 
LOK |0 008 221103||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#44590E59DA6B89E53299BF81A1C873FEEA592DC8 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40377927 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL