The Rhetoric of Legal Disputation : Neo-Ahl al-Ḥadīth vs. Yūsuf al-Qaraḍāwī
The essay deals with the bitter polemics between Neo-Ahl al-Ḥadīth and Sheikh Yūsuf al-Qaraḍāwī, a well-known legal scholar in the contemporary Muslim Sunni world. In addition to analyzing the substantial claims made by one party against the other one, the essay focuses on the rhetorical devices use...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2015
|
In: |
Islamic law and society
Year: 2015, Volume: 22, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 114-141 |
Further subjects: | B
juristic knowledge
B Qaraḍāwī B Wahhabis B Wasaṭiyya B Zahiris B Salafis B Rhetorical Devices |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1820638294 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221103052707.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221103s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/15685195-02212p04 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1820638294 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1820638294 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Shaham, Ron |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Rhetoric of Legal Disputation : Neo-Ahl al-Ḥadīth vs. Yūsuf al-Qaraḍāwī |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The essay deals with the bitter polemics between Neo-Ahl al-Ḥadīth and Sheikh Yūsuf al-Qaraḍāwī, a well-known legal scholar in the contemporary Muslim Sunni world. In addition to analyzing the substantial claims made by one party against the other one, the essay focuses on the rhetorical devices used by both parties. It analyzes these devices in light of theories of Pragmatics in the field of discourse analysis, with special attention to the distinction between a “discussion” and an “argument.” My main finding is that Qaraḍāwī’s critics seek to ruin his public “face” because, in their view “modernist-reformist” religious figures like Qaraḍāwī are agents of Western-oriented secularization, camouflaged by a pseudo-orthodox juristic dress. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Rhetorical Devices | |
650 | 4 | |a juristic knowledge | |
650 | 4 | |a Zahiris | |
650 | 4 | |a Wahhabis | |
650 | 4 | |a Salafis | |
650 | 4 | |a Wasaṭiyya | |
650 | 4 | |a Qaraḍāwī | |
650 | 4 | |a Rhetorical Devices | |
650 | 4 | |a juristic knowledge | |
650 | 4 | |a Zahiris | |
650 | 4 | |a Wahhabis | |
650 | 4 | |a Salafis | |
650 | 4 | |a Wasaṭiyya | |
650 | 4 | |a Qaraḍāwī | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Islamic law and society |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1994 |g 22(2015), 1/2, Seite 114-141 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)32444639X |w (DE-600)2036948-7 |w (DE-576)099025817 |x 1568-5195 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2015 |g number:1/2 |g pages:114-141 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/43304529 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-02212p04 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/ils/22/1-2/article-p114_4.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4205889607 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1820638294 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221103052707 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221103||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#046E6613E1486D71FB66BB0DC951FD6EA48C2395 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/43304529 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |