Why the Good is supremely good: a defence of the Monologion proof
The opening chapters of Anselm's Monologion contain a ‘proof’ of a perfect being, which has received far less attention than the more famous Proslogion proof, and the ontological arguments derived from it. I wish to rectify this by developing an argument in defence of a crucial premise of the M...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2022
|
In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2022, Volume: 58, Issue: 4, Pages: 715-731 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Anselm, Canterbury, Erzbischof, Heiliger 1033-1109, Monologion
/ The Good
/ Theism
/ Natural theology
/ Ontological proof of God's existence
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
Further subjects: | B
Axiology
B Monologion B Metaphysics B Natural Theology B Anselm |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1820774058 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230803080309.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221104s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412521000275 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1820774058 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1820774058 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1258295334 |0 (DE-627)1804283045 |4 aut |a Ray, Christophe de | |
109 | |a Ray, Christophe de |a Rauglaudre, Christophe de | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Why the Good is supremely good |b a defence of the Monologion proof |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The opening chapters of Anselm's Monologion contain a ‘proof’ of a perfect being, which has received far less attention than the more famous Proslogion proof, and the ontological arguments derived from it. I wish to rectify this by developing an argument in defence of a crucial premise of the Monologion proof. This premise states that ‘the Good’, i.e. that in virtue of which numerically distinct things may all be good, must itself be a supremely good thing (if it exists). I motivate the argument before considering objections to both premises, as well as putative ‘parodies’ of my argument. Part of the motivation of my argument will involve the claim that the Good, if it is good at all, must be a paradigm good thing. I conclude that theists have a second kind of ontological argument at their disposal. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Anselm | |
650 | 4 | |a Monologion | |
650 | 4 | |a Axiology | |
650 | 4 | |a Metaphysics | |
650 | 4 | |a Natural Theology | |
652 | |a AB:NBC | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d u |0 (DE-588)4569084-4 |0 (DE-627)30663578X |0 (DE-576)213801272 |a Anselm |2 gnd |c Canterbury, Erzbischof, Heiliger |d 1033-1109 |t Monologion |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4022600-1 |0 (DE-627)106307991 |0 (DE-576)208944702 |2 gnd |a Das Gute |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059729-5 |0 (DE-627)10614250X |0 (DE-576)209131942 |2 gnd |a Theismus |
689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4041356-1 |0 (DE-627)10621957X |0 (DE-576)209044578 |2 gnd |a Natürliche Theologie |
689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4139857-9 |0 (DE-627)10440888X |0 (DE-576)20969789X |2 gnd |a Ontologischer Gottesbeweis |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 58(2022), 4, Seite 715-731 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:58 |g year:2022 |g number:4 |g pages:715-731 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412521000275 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/why-the-good-is-supremely-good-a-defence-of-the-monologion-proof/0C2922EE7220B88C85754F37B53325B9 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 420655319X | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1820774058 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20230803080309 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221104||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Natural theology,Theologia naturalis,Ontological proof of God's existence,Ontological argument,God's existence,The Good,Good and evil,Theism |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Le bien,Bien (philosophie),Preuve ontologique de l’existence de Dieu,Argument ontologique,Argument ontologique,Théisme,Théologie naturelle |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Lo bien,Prueba ontológica de la existencia de Dios,Teología natural,Teísmo |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Il bene,Prova ontologica dell'esistenza di Dio,Argomento ontologico,Argomento ontologico,Teismo,Teologia naturale |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 有神论,神存在的本体论论证,神存在的存有论论证,自然神学,那 好的,那 美善的,那 善的 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 有神論,神存在的本體論論證,神存在的存有論論證,自然神學,那 好的,那 美善的,那 善的 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a O bem,Prova ontológica da existência de Deus,Teologia natural,Teísmo |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Добро,Естественное богословие,Онтологическое доказательство существования Бога,Теизм |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Θεϊσμός,Οντολογική απόδειξη της ύπαρξης του Θεού,Το Καλό,Φυσική θεολογία |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Anselm,Anselmo,Anselmus,Cantuariensis, Anselmus,Anselmus,Ansshelmus Sankt,Canterbury, Anshelm von,Anselme,Anßhelmus,Anselmus,Anshelmus,Anßelmus,Anselmus,Ancelmus |
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Gutes , Theologia naturalis |