A Faith for the Future: Why Non-doxastic Traditional Religion is the Preferable Form of Evolutionary Religion

In the philosophy of J. L. Schellenberg, "evolutionary religion" is a religious stance oriented towards the deep future. According to Schellenberg, the best form of evolutionary religion is non-doxastic faith in ultimism. I reject Schellenberg’s arguments for preferring ultimism and sugges...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:"Special Issue - The Future of Philosophy of Religion"
Main Author: Palmqvist, Carl-Johan (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham 2022
In: European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2022, Volume: 14, Issue: 1, Pages: 95-122
Further subjects:B Sceptical Religion
B Non-Doxasticism
B Schellenberg
B Agnosticism
B Evolutionary religion
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1821176324
003 DE-627
005 20221108124216.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221108s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.24204/ejpr.2022.3677  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821176324 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821176324 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1192718194  |0 (DE-627)167122356X  |4 aut  |a Palmqvist, Carl-Johan 
109 |a Palmqvist, Carl-Johan 
245 1 2 |a A Faith for the Future  |b Why Non-doxastic Traditional Religion is the Preferable Form of Evolutionary Religion 
246 1 |i Rubrikentitel  |a "Special Issue - The Future of Philosophy of Religion" 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In the philosophy of J. L. Schellenberg, "evolutionary religion" is a religious stance oriented towards the deep future. According to Schellenberg, the best form of evolutionary religion is non-doxastic faith in ultimism. I reject Schellenberg’s arguments for preferring ultimism and suggest that committing non-doxastically to traditional religion makes more sense from an evolutionary perspective. I argue that the alignment argument for traditional religion remains sound even when the deep future is considered. Furthermore, I assess Schellenberg's claim that humanity is religiously immature. 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a Agnosticism 
650 4 |a Evolutionary religion 
650 4 |a Non-Doxasticism 
650 4 |a Sceptical Religion 
650 4 |a Schellenberg 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European journal for philosophy of religion  |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009  |g 14(2022), 1, Seite 95-122  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)718600770  |w (DE-600)2659606-4  |w (DE-576)477533728  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:14  |g year:2022  |g number:1  |g pages:95-122 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2022.3677  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.philosophy-of-religion.eu/index.php/ejpr/article/view/3677  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4207423230 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821176324 
LOK |0 005 20221108122404 
LOK |0 008 221108||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL