Has Plantinga “buried” Mackie’s logical argument from evil?
In seeking to undermine Mackie’s logical argument from evil, Plantinga assumes that Mackie’s argument regards it as a necessary truth that a wholly good God would eliminate all evil that he could eliminate. I argue that this is an interpretative mistake, and that Mackie is merely assuming that the t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2014
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2014, Volume: 75, Issue: 3, Pages: 189-196 |
| Further subjects: | B
Logical argument from evil
B problem of evil B Alvin Plantinga B John Mackie |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1821412966 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221110052712.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221110s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-014-9448-3 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1821412966 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821412966 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kraal, Anders |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Kraal, Anders | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Has Plantinga “buried” Mackie’s logical argument from evil? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In seeking to undermine Mackie’s logical argument from evil, Plantinga assumes that Mackie’s argument regards it as a necessary truth that a wholly good God would eliminate all evil that he could eliminate. I argue that this is an interpretative mistake, and that Mackie is merely assuming that the theist believes that God’s goodness entails that God would eliminate all evil that he could eliminate. Once the difference between these two assumptions, and the implausibility of Plantinga’s assumption, are brought out, Plantinga’s celebrated critique of Mackie’s argument can be seen to be far less compelling than is often assumed to be the case. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a problem of evil | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Logical argument from evil | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Alvin Plantinga | |
| 650 | 4 | |a John Mackie | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970 |g 75(2014), 3, Seite 189-196 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:75 |g year:2014 |g number:3 |g pages:189-196 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709243 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-014-9448-3 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 75 |j 2014 |e 3 |h 189-196 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4208216972 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1821412966 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221110052712 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#0D214B2B30E3DD754AE300E5A2F95A0154B0A33E | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709243 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||