The normatively relativised logical argument from evil
It is widely agreed that the ‘Logical’ Argument from Evil (LAFE) is bankrupt. We aim to rehabilitate the LAFE, in the form of what we call the Normatively Relativised Logical Argument from Evil (NRLAFE). There are many different versions of a NRLAFE. We aim to show that one version, what we call the...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2011
|
In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2011, Volume: 70, Issue: 2, Pages: 109-126 |
Further subjects: | B
Concepts of God
B Theism B Theodicy B Skeptical theism B Argument from Evil B Relationship ethics |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1821414020 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221110052716.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221110s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-010-9282-1 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1821414020 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821414020 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Bishop, John |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The normatively relativised logical argument from evil |
264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a It is widely agreed that the ‘Logical’ Argument from Evil (LAFE) is bankrupt. We aim to rehabilitate the LAFE, in the form of what we call the Normatively Relativised Logical Argument from Evil (NRLAFE). There are many different versions of a NRLAFE. We aim to show that one version, what we call the ‘right relationship’ NRLAFE, poses a significant threat to personal-omniGod-theism—understood as requiring the belief that there is an omnipotent, omniscient, perfectly good person who has created our world—because it appeals to value commitments theists themselves are likely to endorse. The ultimate success of this NRLAFE will rest on developing a theological ethics of right relationship that rejects as morally flawed the exercise of omnipotence first to sustain horrors and then to redeem them. Yet a vindicated NRLAFE of this sort need not require atheism, but only rejection of the standard conception of God as a personal omniGod. | ||
601 | |a Argumentation | ||
650 | 4 | |a Concepts of God | |
650 | 4 | |a Relationship ethics | |
650 | 4 | |a Skeptical theism | |
650 | 4 | |a Theodicy | |
650 | 4 | |a Argument from Evil | |
650 | 4 | |a Theism | |
700 | 1 | |a Perszyk, Ken |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 70(2011), 2, Seite 109-126 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:70 |g year:2011 |g number:2 |g pages:109-126 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)164689555X |k Electronic | ||
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474804 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9282-1 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4208218037 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1821414020 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221110052716 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#EB83510FD67AF8FC2E1AD2E6D208F57E292D0B67 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474804 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |