The normatively relativised logical argument from evil

It is widely agreed that the ‘Logical’ Argument from Evil (LAFE) is bankrupt. We aim to rehabilitate the LAFE, in the form of what we call the Normatively Relativised Logical Argument from Evil (NRLAFE). There are many different versions of a NRLAFE. We aim to show that one version, what we call the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Bishop, John (Author) ; Perszyk, Ken (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Nature B. V 2011
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2011, Volume: 70, Issue: 2, Pages: 109-126
Further subjects:B Concepts of God
B Theism
B Theodicy
B Skeptical theism
B Argument from Evil
B Relationship ethics
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1821414020
003 DE-627
005 20221110052716.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-010-9282-1  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821414020 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821414020 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Bishop, John  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The normatively relativised logical argument from evil 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a It is widely agreed that the ‘Logical’ Argument from Evil (LAFE) is bankrupt. We aim to rehabilitate the LAFE, in the form of what we call the Normatively Relativised Logical Argument from Evil (NRLAFE). There are many different versions of a NRLAFE. We aim to show that one version, what we call the ‘right relationship’ NRLAFE, poses a significant threat to personal-omniGod-theism—understood as requiring the belief that there is an omnipotent, omniscient, perfectly good person who has created our world—because it appeals to value commitments theists themselves are likely to endorse. The ultimate success of this NRLAFE will rest on developing a theological ethics of right relationship that rejects as morally flawed the exercise of omnipotence first to sustain horrors and then to redeem them. Yet a vindicated NRLAFE of this sort need not require atheism, but only rejection of the standard conception of God as a personal omniGod. 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a Concepts of God 
650 4 |a Relationship ethics 
650 4 |a Skeptical theism 
650 4 |a Theodicy 
650 4 |a Argument from Evil 
650 4 |a Theism 
700 1 |a Perszyk, Ken  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970  |g 70(2011), 2, Seite 109-126  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:70  |g year:2011  |g number:2  |g pages:109-126 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)164689555X  |k Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474804  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9282-1  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208218037 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821414020 
LOK |0 005 20221110052716 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#EB83510FD67AF8FC2E1AD2E6D208F57E292D0B67 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474804 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL