What is wrong with intelligent design?

While a great deal of abuse has been directed at intelligent design theory (ID), its starting point is a fact about biological organisms that cries out for explanation, namely “specified complexity” (SC). Advocates of ID deploy three kind of argument from specified complexity to the existence of a d...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dawes, Gregory W. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Nature B. V 2007
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2007, Volume: 61, Issue: 2, Pages: 69-81
Further subjects:B Intelligent design
B Teleological arguments
B Design Arguments
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1821414748
003 DE-627
005 20221110052719.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-007-9112-2  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821414748 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821414748 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Dawes, Gregory W.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a What is wrong with intelligent design? 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a While a great deal of abuse has been directed at intelligent design theory (ID), its starting point is a fact about biological organisms that cries out for explanation, namely “specified complexity” (SC). Advocates of ID deploy three kind of argument from specified complexity to the existence of a designer: an eliminative argument, an inductive argument, and an inference to the best explanation. Only the first of these merits the abuse directed at it; the other two arguments are worthy of respect. If they fail, it is only because we have a better explanation of SC, namely Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection. 
650 4 |a Teleological arguments 
650 4 |a Design Arguments 
650 4 |a Intelligent Design 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970  |g 61(2007), 2, Seite 69-81  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:61  |g year:2007  |g number:2  |g pages:69-81 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646210212  |k Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27646202  |x JSTOR 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/DAWWIW.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-007-9112-2  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208218754 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821414748 
LOK |0 005 20221110052719 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#D99DD8BACF047B892ADFE9DB08C035F499ADAF3D 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27646202 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Intelligent design,ID,Neo-creationism,Intelligent design theory 
STB 0 0 |a Dessein intelligent 
STC 0 0 |a Diseño inteligente 
STD 0 0 |a Disegno intelligente 
STG 0 0 |a Desenho inteligente 
STH 0 0 |a Интеллегентный дизайн 
STI 0 0 |a Ευφυής σχεδιασμός 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Intelligent-Design-Theorie,Neo-Kreationismus,ID,Intelligent Design-Theorie,IDTh 

Similar Items

more