Disagreement

There has been a recent explosion of interest in the epistemology of disagreement. Much of the recent literature is concerned with a particular range of puzzle cases (discussed in the “Cases” section of my paper). Almost all of the papers that contribute to that recent literature make mention of que...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oppy, Graham (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Nature B. V 2010
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2010, Volume: 68, Issue: 1, Pages: 183-199
Further subjects:B Reasonable disagreement
B Religious Disagreement
B Epistemology of disagreement
B Doxastic peer
B Shared evidence
B Disagreement
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1821414977
003 DE-627
005 20221110052720.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-010-9254-5  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821414977 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821414977 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Oppy, Graham  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Disagreement 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a There has been a recent explosion of interest in the epistemology of disagreement. Much of the recent literature is concerned with a particular range of puzzle cases (discussed in the “Cases” section of my paper). Almost all of the papers that contribute to that recent literature make mention of questions about religious disagreement in ways that suggest that there are interesting connections between those puzzle cases and real life cases of religious disagreement. One important aim of my paper is to cast doubt on that suggestion. More generally, the aim of my paper is to give a reasonably full account of the recent literature on the epistemology of disagreement, and then to give a serious discussion of some of the epistemological issues that are raised by real world religious disagreements. 
650 4 |a Shared evidence 
650 4 |a Religious Disagreement 
650 4 |a Reasonable disagreement 
650 4 |a Epistemology of disagreement 
650 4 |a Doxastic peer 
650 4 |a Disagreement 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970  |g 68(2010), 1, Seite 183-199  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:68  |g year:2010  |g number:1  |g pages:183-199 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40981217  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9254-5  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208218983 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821414977 
LOK |0 005 20221110052720 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#0236762FA861D74AB3499E776BDB23EDFFF470F9 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40981217 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL