The logic and language of Nirvāna: A contemporary interpretation
In contrast to historically orientedapproaches, this paper tackles the concept ofNirvāna from the perspective ofcontemporary philosophy of language. It focuseson four propositions: Nirvāna exists;Nirvāna does not exist; Nirvāna existsand does not exist; Nirvāna neither exists nordoes not exist. The...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2003
|
In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2003, Volume: 53, Issue: 2, Pages: 93-110 |
Further subjects: | B
Theoretical Term
B Contemporary Interpretation B Linguistic Function |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1821415841 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221110052723.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221110s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1023/A:1023329532527 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1821415841 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821415841 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kūgler, Peter |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The logic and language of Nirvāna: A contemporary interpretation |
264 | 1 | |c 2003 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In contrast to historically orientedapproaches, this paper tackles the concept ofNirvāna from the perspective ofcontemporary philosophy of language. It focuseson four propositions: Nirvāna exists;Nirvāna does not exist; Nirvāna existsand does not exist; Nirvāna neither exists nordoes not exist. The Buddha's rejectionof these propositions is interpreted by meansof explicit and conditionaldefinitions of existence. Stalnaker's notion ofpragmatic presupposition providesan explanation why the propositions are withoutmeaning. After comparing theword ``Nirvāna'' with indexicals, propernames and theoretical terms, it is finallyasked what linguistic function the word has. | ||
601 | |a Interpretation | ||
650 | 4 | |a Contemporary Interpretation | |
650 | 4 | |a Linguistic Function | |
650 | 4 | |a Theoretical Term | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 53(2003), 2, Seite 93-110 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:53 |g year:2003 |g number:2 |g pages:93-110 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40036598 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023329532527 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4208219858 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1821415841 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221110052723 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#6B589EDAFA718D176278A05D15C5AAF572AC2F7C | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40036598 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |