Religious disagreement: internal and external
Philosophers of religion have taken the assumption for granted that the various religious traditions of the world have incompatible beliefs. In this paper, I will argue that this assumption is more problematic than has been generally recognized. To make this argument, I will discuss the implications...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2013
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2013, Volume: 74, Issue: 1, Pages: 21-31 |
| Further subjects: | B
Exclusivism
B Pluralism B Religious Disagreement B Religious Diversity B Epistemic peer |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1821416775 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221110052726.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221110s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-012-9393-y |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1821416775 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821416775 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Potter, Dennis |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Potter, Dennis | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Religious disagreement: internal and external |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Philosophers of religion have taken the assumption for granted that the various religious traditions of the world have incompatible beliefs. In this paper, I will argue that this assumption is more problematic than has been generally recognized. To make this argument, I will discuss the implications of internal religious disagreement, an aspect of this issue that has been too often ignored in the contemporary debate. I will also briefly examine some implications of my argument for how one might respond to the existence of religious diversity. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Epistemic peer | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pluralism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Exclusivism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Disagreement | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Diversity | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 74(2013), 1, Seite 21-31 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:74 |g year:2013 |g number:1 |g pages:21-31 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1639670513 |k Electronic | ||
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709253 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-012-9393-y |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4208220783 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1821416775 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221110052726 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#7A6D5BFE768DCF2F4B8BA9851582F0EFA846A8ED | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709253 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||