Paying the cost of skeptical theism

In this paper I show that two arguments for the inconsistency of skeptical theism fail. After setting up the debate in “Introduction” section, I show in “The initial debate” section why Mylan Engel’s argument (Engel 2004) against skeptical theism does not succeed. In “COST” section I strengthen the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Snapper, Jeff A. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Nature B. V 2011
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2011, Volume: 69, Issue: 1, Pages: 45-56
Further subjects:B CORNEA
B epistemic closure
B Counterfactuals
B Evidential atheism
B problem of evil
B Skeptical theism
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1821416880
003 DE-627
005 20221206144856.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-010-9235-8  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821416880 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821416880 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Snapper, Jeff A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Snapper, Jeff A.  |a Snapper, Jeffrey 
245 1 0 |a Paying the cost of skeptical theism 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this paper I show that two arguments for the inconsistency of skeptical theism fail. After setting up the debate in “Introduction” section, I show in “The initial debate” section why Mylan Engel’s argument (Engel 2004) against skeptical theism does not succeed. In “COST” section I strengthen the argument so that it both avoids my reply to Engel and parallels Jon Laraudogoitia’s argument against skeptical theism (Laraudogoitia 2000). In “COST*” section, I provide three replies—one by an evidentialist theist, one by a closure-denying theist, and one by a necessitarian theist, and argue that the necessitarian’s reply successfully rebuts the inconsistency charge. I conclude that skeptical theism which accepts God’s necessary existence is immune to both kinds of arguments for its inconsistency. 
650 4 |a Counterfactuals 
650 4 |a epistemic closure 
650 4 |a Evidential atheism 
650 4 |a CORNEA 
650 4 |a Skeptical theism 
650 4 |a problem of evil 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970  |g 69(2011), 1, Seite 45-56  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:69  |g year:2011  |g number:1  |g pages:45-56 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646895339  |k Electronic 
787 0 8 |i Errata  |a Snapper, Jeff A.  |t Erratum to: Paying the cost of skeptical theism  |d 2011  |w (DE-627)1821423941 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474768  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9235-8  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208220899 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821416880 
LOK |0 005 20221110052727 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#DF2896F4AB69B8B52F1CB5F70EAA3AFB4625E5B8 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474768 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL