Closed systems, explanations, and the cosmological argument

Examples involving infinite suspended chains or infinite trains are sometimes used to defend perceived weaknesses in traditional cosmological arguments. In this article, we distinguish two versions of the cosmological argument, suggest that such examples can only be relevant if it is one specific ty...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal for philosophy of religion
Authors: Davey, Kevin (Author) ; Lippelmann, Mark (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2007
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Further subjects:B Closed systems
B Causation in esse
B Explanation
B Causation
B Efficient cause
B Cosmological Argument
B First cause
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1821417011
003 DE-627
005 20221110052727.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-007-9134-9  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821417011 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821417011 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Davey, Kevin  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Davey, Kevin 
245 1 0 |a Closed systems, explanations, and the cosmological argument 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Examples involving infinite suspended chains or infinite trains are sometimes used to defend perceived weaknesses in traditional cosmological arguments. In this article, we distinguish two versions of the cosmological argument, suggest that such examples can only be relevant if it is one specific type of cosmological argument that is being considered, and then criticize the use of such examples in this particular type of cosmological argument. Our criticism revolves around a discussion of what it means to call a system closed, and what it means to call an explanation complete. Our analysis makes no suppositions about the nature of the infinite, and is therefore independent of many of the issues around which contemporary discussions of the cosmological argument have tended to revolve. 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a Causation in esse 
650 4 |a Efficient cause 
650 4 |a First cause 
650 4 |a Causation 
650 4 |a Closed systems 
650 4 |a Explanation 
650 4 |a Cosmological Argument 
700 1 |a Lippelmann, Mark  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970  |g 62(2007), 2, Seite 89-101  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:62  |g year:2007  |g number:2  |g pages:89-101 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646896971  |k Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27646232  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-007-9134-9  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 62  |j 2007  |e 2  |h 89-101 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 420822102X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821417011 
LOK |0 005 20221110052727 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#63524EE00E6A1E58D93E0A8B9D6A06C36F4F1B4C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27646232 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL