Secularity and biblical literalism: confronting the case for epistemological diversity
Stephen Carter argues that biblical literalism is predicated on an epistemological position drastically different than that maintained by mainstream scientists inasmuch as it operates on the basis of a “hermeneutic of inerrancy” with respect to the ideas laid out in the Bible. By relying on consider...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2012
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2012, Volume: 71, Issue: 3, Pages: 205-219 |
| Further subjects: | B
Charles Taylor
B Secularity B Stephen Carter B Epistemological diversity B Ethic of certainty B Biblical Literalism B Doubt |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1821417313 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221110052728.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221110s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-011-9332-3 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1821417313 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821417313 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Smith, Andrew F. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Secularity and biblical literalism: confronting the case for epistemological diversity |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Stephen Carter argues that biblical literalism is predicated on an epistemological position drastically different than that maintained by mainstream scientists inasmuch as it operates on the basis of a “hermeneutic of inerrancy” with respect to the ideas laid out in the Bible. By relying on considerations offered by Charles Taylor and recent sociological studies, I contend that Carter’s thesis is incorrect. The divide between proponents and opponents of biblical literalism is ethical rather than epistemological. Beyond the philosophical implications of my contention, this displays that deliberative engagement between these parties—which depends on shared epistemological norms—is possible in principle. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Stephen Carter | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Charles Taylor | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethic of certainty | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Epistemological diversity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Doubt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Secularity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Biblical Literalism | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 71(2012), 3, Seite 205-219 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:71 |g year:2012 |g number:3 |g pages:205-219 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/23258344 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-011-9332-3 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4208221321 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1821417313 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221110052728 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#22458FF4CE835230B548F5EDFA13C48BEB683675 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/23258344 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||