A critique of foundationalist conceptions of comprehensive doctrines in the religion in politics-debate
This paper comprises a critical examination of foundationalist conceptions of comprehensive doctrines in the religion in politics-debate. I argue that John Rawls, the towering figure of this debate, operates with a foundationalist conception of comprehensive doctrines that has shaped the debate’s vi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2009
|
In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2009, Volume: 65, Issue: 1, Pages: 11-28 |
Further subjects: | B
Exclusivism
B Pragmatism B Religion in politics B Comprehensive doctrines B Inclusivism B Rawls |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1821417348 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221110052728.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221110s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-008-9176-7 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1821417348 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821417348 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Zackariasson, Ulf |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 2 | |a A critique of foundationalist conceptions of comprehensive doctrines in the religion in politics-debate |
264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This paper comprises a critical examination of foundationalist conceptions of comprehensive doctrines in the religion in politics-debate. I argue that John Rawls, the towering figure of this debate, operates with a foundationalist conception of comprehensive doctrines that has shaped the debate’s view of relevant alternatives (often referred to as exclusivism and inclusivism). However, there are several problems with foundationalist conceptions, and the most serious is that they are empirically inadequate in relation to modern Western societies. I conclude that participants of the exclusivist/inclusivist debate ought to look closer at alternative, non-foundationalist conceptions, and I supply a brief sketch of one such approach, inspired by American pragmatism. | ||
601 | |a doctrina | ||
601 | |a Religion | ||
650 | 4 | |a Pragmatism | |
650 | 4 | |a Inclusivism | |
650 | 4 | |a Exclusivism | |
650 | 4 | |a Religion in politics | |
650 | 4 | |a Comprehensive doctrines | |
650 | 4 | |a Rawls | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 65(2009), 1, Seite 11-28 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:65 |g year:2009 |g number:1 |g pages:11-28 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1646351479 |k Electronic | ||
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40270235 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-008-9176-7 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4208221356 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1821417348 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221110052728 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#C42FD25633F8AF6B58235AE20D6734490D342F7C | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40270235 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |