`In every civilized community': Hume on belief and the demise of religion
This paper considers the claim that Hume washostile to religion and religious belief, andhoped for their demise. Part one examines hisapproach to belief, showing how commentatorstake him to see religious belief asnon-natural. Part two challenges thisconclusion by arguing, first, that Hume'sdist...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2004
|
In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2004, Volume: 55, Issue: 3, Pages: 171-185 |
Further subjects: | B
Civilized Community
B Critical Remark B Religious Belief |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1821417860 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221110052730.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221110s2004 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1023/B:RELI.0000034612.68209.02 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1821417860 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821417860 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Costelloe, Timothy M. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
109 | |a Costelloe, Timothy M. | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a `In every civilized community': Hume on belief and the demise of religion |
264 | 1 | |c 2004 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This paper considers the claim that Hume washostile to religion and religious belief, andhoped for their demise. Part one examines hisapproach to belief, showing how commentatorstake him to see religious belief asnon-natural. Part two challenges thisconclusion by arguing, first, that Hume'sdistinction between natural and artificialvirtue allows the term ``natural'' to coverreligious belief as well; second, that Humehimself never denies religious belief isnatural, and, third, that he takes religion tobe a necessary part of any flourishing society. The target of Hume's critical remarks onreligion, it is then emphasized, are forms of``false'' religion, which arise from thecorrupting influence of passion, hypocrisy,bigotry, enthusiasm, and superstition. Atbest, it is concluded, the claim that Hume washostile to religion requires qualification,while the view that he was in favor of itsactual demise is largely unwarranted. | ||
601 | |a Religion | ||
650 | 4 | |a Civilized Community | |
650 | 4 | |a Critical Remark | |
650 | 4 | |a Religious Belief | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 55(2004), 3, Seite 171-185 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:55 |g year:2004 |g number:3 |g pages:171-185 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40018287 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RELI.0000034612.68209.02 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4208221879 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1821417860 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221110052730 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#970F800A50AC4020B3A5D9700E38C977D0E651D7 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40018287 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |