The logic of authoritative revelations
Despite the tendency to think that the justification of revealed truths depends on a verifiable contact with divine reality, this essay argues that the authoritative status of revelations is due to their role in defining a distinctively religious order of judgment. Rather than being immediately appa...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2010
|
In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2010, Volume: 68, Issue: 1, Pages: 167-181 |
Further subjects: | B
Conceptual truths
B Authority B Revelation B Kierkegaard B Divine B Matters of principle B Mistaken and revised revelations B Wittgenstein B Human communication |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1821418255 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221110052731.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221110s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-010-9260-7 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1821418255 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821418255 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Whittaker, John H. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The logic of authoritative revelations |
264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Despite the tendency to think that the justification of revealed truths depends on a verifiable contact with divine reality, this essay argues that the authoritative status of revelations is due to their role in defining a distinctively religious order of judgment. Rather than being immediately apparent to everyone, this kind of authority is local to particular forms of judgment that depend on the principles that frame these ways of thinking. Revelatory claims are logically exempted from the normal demands of justification because of this role they have as definitive judgments, and they share their immunity from ordinary forms of justification with other axiomatic principles. Yet their authority can in certain cases be challenged, and it is a secondary purpose of this essay to bring the various ways of challenging their truth to light. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Kierkegaard | |
650 | 4 | |a Wittgenstein | |
650 | 4 | |a Conceptual truths | |
650 | 4 | |a Mistaken and revised revelations | |
650 | 4 | |a Human communication | |
650 | 4 | |a Divine | |
650 | 4 | |a Matters of principle | |
650 | 4 | |a Authority | |
650 | 4 | |a Revelation | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 68(2010), 1, Seite 167-181 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:68 |g year:2010 |g number:1 |g pages:167-181 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1646135415 |k Electronic | ||
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40981216 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9260-7 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4208222263 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1821418255 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221110052731 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#1F94F3349938C5999857EBA0BB95A5E3A9F6F36C | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40981216 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |