Whatever it is better to be than not to be
The Anselmian claim that God is that than which a greater cannot be thought in virtue of being ‘whatever it is better to be than not to be’ may be accused of incoherence or even unintelligibility. By proposing a non-relative but apparently meaningful analysis thereof, I attempt to defend it against...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2013
|
| Dans: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Année: 2013, Volume: 74, Numéro: 1, Pages: 131-143 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Possibilism
B Actualism B Morality B Great Chain of Being B That than which a greater cannot be thought B Greatness B Actuality B God B Anselm B Universal value-commensurability |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Édition parallèle: | Électronique
|