Collins’ core fine-tuning argument
Collins (The Blackwell companion to natural theology, 2009) presents an argument he calls the ‘core fine-tuning argument’. In this paper, I show that Collins’ argument is flawed in at least two ways. First, the structure, depending on likelihoods, fails to establish anything about the posterior prob...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2014
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2014, Volume: 76, Issue: 2, Pages: 209-222 |
| Further subjects: | B
Design
B God B Fine-tuning argument |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1821419375 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221110052734.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221110s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-014-9453-6 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1821419375 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821419375 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Saward, Mark Douglas |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Saward, Mark Douglas |a Saward, Mark | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Collins’ core fine-tuning argument |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Collins (The Blackwell companion to natural theology, 2009) presents an argument he calls the ‘core fine-tuning argument’. In this paper, I show that Collins’ argument is flawed in at least two ways. First, the structure, depending on likelihoods, fails to establish anything about the posterior probability of God’s existence given fine-tuning. As an argument for God’s existence, this is a serious failing. Second, his analysis of what is appropriately restricted background knowledge, combined with the credences of a specially chosen ‘alien’, do not allow him to establish the premise \( \Pr (LPU \mid NSU~ \& ~k') \ll 1\). | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Design | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fine-tuning argument | |
| 650 | 4 | |a God | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 76(2014), 2, Seite 209-222 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:76 |g year:2014 |g number:2 |g pages:209-222 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709224 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-014-9453-6 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4208223383 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1821419375 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221110052734 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#216BC6527FB2CF31330D756ACCD5792D027B10F2 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709224 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Design |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Design,Dessein,Dessein |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Design,Deseño,Deseño |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Design |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 設計 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Design,Desenho,Desenho |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Дизайн |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Design,Σχεδιασμός,Ντιζάιν |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Formgebung,Eingetragenes Design |