Skeptical theism and divine permission: a reply to Anderson

Skeptical theism (ST) may undercut the key inference in the evidential argument from evil, but it does so at a cost. If ST is true, then we lose our ability to assess the all things considered (ATC) value of natural events and states of affairs. And if we lose that ability, a whole slew of undesirab...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Danaher, John 1967- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2014
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2014, Volume: 75, Issue: 2, Pages: 101-118
Further subjects:B All things considered value
B problem of evil
B Skeptical theism
B Moral ignorance
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1821419510
003 DE-627
005 20250325024901.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-013-9429-y  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821419510 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821419510 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |8 1\p  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1031899413  |0 (DE-627)737511834  |0 (DE-576)37959949X  |4 aut  |a Danaher, John  |d 1967- 
109 |a Danaher, John 1967- 
245 1 0 |a Skeptical theism and divine permission: a reply to Anderson 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Skeptical theism (ST) may undercut the key inference in the evidential argument from evil, but it does so at a cost. If ST is true, then we lose our ability to assess the all things considered (ATC) value of natural events and states of affairs. And if we lose that ability, a whole slew of undesirable consequences follow. So goes a common consequential critique of ST. In a recent article, Anderson has argued that this consequential critique is flawed. Anderson claims that ST only has the consequence that we lack epistemic access to potentially God-justifying reasons for permitting a prima facie “bad” (or “evil”) event. But this is very different from lacking epistemic access to the ATC value of such events. God could have an (unknowable) reason for not intervening to prevent E and yet E could still be (knowably) ATC-bad. Ingenious though it is, this article argues that Anderson’s attempted defence of ST is flawed. This is for two reasons. First, and most importantly, the consequential critique does not rely on the questionable assumption he identifies. Indeed, the argument can be made quite easily by relying purely on Anderson’s distinction between God-justifying reasons for permitting E and the ATC value of E. And second, Anderson’s defence of his position, if correct, would serve to undermine the foundations of ST. 
650 4 |a All things considered value 
650 4 |a problem of evil 
650 4 |a Moral ignorance 
650 4 |a Skeptical theism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970  |g 75(2014), 2, Seite 101-118  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:75  |g year:2014  |g number:2  |g pages:101-118 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1639680535  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709266  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-013-9429-y  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
883 |8 1\p  |a cgwrk  |d 20250301  |q DE-101  |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208223529 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821419510 
LOK |0 005 20221110052735 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#824B8508A2CABB0BF6A9C6E4B46531CF22E05E78 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709266 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 10-11-22  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL