Perfection, near-perfection, maximality, and Anselmian Theism

Anselmian theists claim (a) that there is a being than which none greater can be conceived; and (b) that it is knowable on purely—solely, entirely—a priori grounds that there is a being than which none greater can be conceived. In this paper, I argue that Anselmian Theism gains traction by conflatin...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oppy, Graham (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Nature B. V 2011
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2011, Volume: 69, Issue: 2, Pages: 119-138
Further subjects:B Anselmian Theism
B Nagasawa
B Ontological Argument
B Perfection
B God
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1821420586
003 DE-627
005 20221110052738.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-010-9268-z  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821420586 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821420586 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Oppy, Graham  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Perfection, near-perfection, maximality, and Anselmian Theism 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Anselmian theists claim (a) that there is a being than which none greater can be conceived; and (b) that it is knowable on purely—solely, entirely—a priori grounds that there is a being than which none greater can be conceived. In this paper, I argue that Anselmian Theism gains traction by conflating different interpretations of the key description ‘being than which no greater can be conceived’. In particular, I insist that it is very important to distinguish between ideal excellence and maximal possible excellence. At the end of my paper, I illustrate the importance of this distinction by applying my discussion to the recent defence of Anselmian Theism in Nagasawa (Philos Q 58:577–591, 2008). 
650 4 |a Perfection 
650 4 |a Ontological Argument 
650 4 |a Nagasawa 
650 4 |a God 
650 4 |a Anselmian Theism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970  |g 69(2011), 2, Seite 119-138  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:69  |g year:2011  |g number:2  |g pages:119-138 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646895428  |k Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474778  |x JSTOR 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/OPPPNM.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9268-z  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208224592 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821420586 
LOK |0 005 20221110052738 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#06D90C762F7A870AF0F41FED777089DCF247D508 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474778 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL