Perfection, near-perfection, maximality, and Anselmian Theism
Anselmian theists claim (a) that there is a being than which none greater can be conceived; and (b) that it is knowable on purely—solely, entirely—a priori grounds that there is a being than which none greater can be conceived. In this paper, I argue that Anselmian Theism gains traction by conflatin...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2011
|
In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2011, Volume: 69, Issue: 2, Pages: 119-138 |
Further subjects: | B
Anselmian Theism
B Nagasawa B Ontological Argument B Perfection B God |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1821420586 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221110052738.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221110s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-010-9268-z |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1821420586 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821420586 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Oppy, Graham |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Perfection, near-perfection, maximality, and Anselmian Theism |
264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Anselmian theists claim (a) that there is a being than which none greater can be conceived; and (b) that it is knowable on purely—solely, entirely—a priori grounds that there is a being than which none greater can be conceived. In this paper, I argue that Anselmian Theism gains traction by conflating different interpretations of the key description ‘being than which no greater can be conceived’. In particular, I insist that it is very important to distinguish between ideal excellence and maximal possible excellence. At the end of my paper, I illustrate the importance of this distinction by applying my discussion to the recent defence of Anselmian Theism in Nagasawa (Philos Q 58:577–591, 2008). | ||
650 | 4 | |a Perfection | |
650 | 4 | |a Ontological Argument | |
650 | 4 | |a Nagasawa | |
650 | 4 | |a God | |
650 | 4 | |a Anselmian Theism | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 69(2011), 2, Seite 119-138 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:69 |g year:2011 |g number:2 |g pages:119-138 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1646895428 |k Electronic | ||
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474778 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/OPPPNM.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9268-z |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4208224592 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1821420586 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221110052738 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#06D90C762F7A870AF0F41FED777089DCF247D508 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474778 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |