The pragmatics of defining religion in a multi-cultural world

Few seem to have difficulty in distinguishing between religious and secular institutions, yet there is widespread disagreement regarding what “religion” actually means. Indeed, some go so far as to question whether there is anything at all distinctive about religions. Hence, formulating a definition...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Harrison, Victoria S. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Nature B. V 2006
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2006, Volume: 59, Issue: 3, Pages: 133-152
Further subjects:B Natural Kind
B Family Resemblance
B Religious Tradition
B Belief System
B Naturalistic Theory
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1821420675
003 DE-627
005 20221110052739.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-006-6961-z  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821420675 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821420675 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Harrison, Victoria S.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The pragmatics of defining religion in a multi-cultural world 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Few seem to have difficulty in distinguishing between religious and secular institutions, yet there is widespread disagreement regarding what “religion” actually means. Indeed, some go so far as to question whether there is anything at all distinctive about religions. Hence, formulating a definition of “religion” that can command wide assent has proven to be an extremely difficult task. In this article, I consider the most prominent of the many rival definitions that have been proposed, the majority falling within three basic types: intellectual, affective and functional definitions. I conclude that there are pragmatic reasons for favouring the formerly popular view that essentialist definitions of “religions” are inadequate, and that religions should be construed, instead, as possessing a number of “family resemblances.” In so arguing, I provide a response to the view that there is nothing distinctive about religions, as well as to the recent claim that religions do not exist. 
601 |a Pragmatik 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a Family Resemblance 
650 4 |a Naturalistic Theory 
650 4 |a Religious Tradition 
650 4 |a Natural Kind 
650 4 |a Belief System 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970  |g 59(2006), 3, Seite 133-152  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:59  |g year:2006  |g number:3  |g pages:133-152 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1645818101  |k Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40036067  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-006-6961-z  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208224681 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821420675 
LOK |0 005 20221110052739 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#67621869D5471A9C62DDB02F10EF50E01B9A63CD 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40036067 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL