Dennett’s deism
To suggest that Daniel Dennett is a deist is to invite ridicule. Dennett is both an avowed atheist and defender of naturalism in philosophy. Yet if we pay heed to the entirety of Dennett’s claims a curious picture emerges. My suggestion is that Hegel and Marx represent the rival responses to what we...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2012
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2012, Volume: 71, Issue: 3, Pages: 221-238 |
| Further subjects: | B
Darwin
B Dennett B Hegel B Naturalism B Marx B Deism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1821421817 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221110052743.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221110s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-010-9279-9 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1821421817 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821421817 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ross, Craig |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Dennett’s deism |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a To suggest that Daniel Dennett is a deist is to invite ridicule. Dennett is both an avowed atheist and defender of naturalism in philosophy. Yet if we pay heed to the entirety of Dennett’s claims a curious picture emerges. My suggestion is that Hegel and Marx represent the rival responses to what we might call the modern predicament: what is the nature of existence in a world which seems a mechanism? Dennett’s response to this question is Hegelian, and involves a commitment to a religiosity which might surprise those otherwise receptive to his arguments. | ||
| 601 | |a Dennett, D. C. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Darwin | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Marx | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hegel | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Naturalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Deism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dennett | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970 |g 71(2012), 3, Seite 221-238 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:71 |g year:2012 |g number:3 |g pages:221-238 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/23258345 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9279-9 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 71 |j 2012 |e 3 |h 221-238 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4208225823 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1821421817 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221110052743 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#94420A80A3A1D93F7B75CD47E39F01A7C5864BF1 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/23258345 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Lotharingus , Marks,Katharinenstadt,Jekaterinenschtadt,Ekaterinenštadt,Marxstadt,Marksschtadt,Marksštadt |