How is God-talk logically possible? A sketch for an argument on the logic of ‘God’
In this paper I want to argue for the optimal way to characterise the logical and semantical behaviour of the singular term ‘God’ used in religious language. The relevance of this enterprise to logical theory is the main focus as well. Doing this presupposes to outline the two rivaling approaches of...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2008
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2008, Volume: 64, Issue: 2, Pages: 75-88 |
| Further subjects: | B
World-lines
B Semantics B Rigid designators B Individuation B Identification B Singular terms B Logic B Language games |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1821421922 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221111223602.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221110s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-008-9164-y |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1821421922 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821421922 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)119538172 |0 (DE-627)080354742 |0 (DE-576)21291166X |4 aut |a Kirjavainen, Heikki |d 1937- | |
| 109 | |a Kirjavainen, Heikki 1937- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a How is God-talk logically possible? A sketch for an argument on the logic of ‘God’ |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this paper I want to argue for the optimal way to characterise the logical and semantical behaviour of the singular term ‘God’ used in religious language. The relevance of this enterprise to logical theory is the main focus as well. Doing this presupposes to outline the two rivaling approaches of well-definition of singular terms: Kripke’s (“rigid designators”) and Hintikka’s (“world-lines”). ‘God’ as a “rigid designator” is purified from all real-life-language-games of identification and only spells out a metaphysical tag, which favours the view of “anything goes”. Instead, ‘God’ as a “world-line,” plus two ways of quantification, is much more flexible to theological traditions, teachings of the church, religious practices and personal feelings. Thus, it provides a sufficiently well-defined singular term for the purposes of logical theory. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Language games | |
| 650 | 4 | |a World-lines | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rigid designators | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Identification | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Individuation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Singular terms | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Semantics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Logic | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970 |g 64(2008), 2, Seite 75-88 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:64 |g year:2008 |g number:2 |g pages:75-88 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40270216 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-008-9164-y |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 64 |j 2008 |e 2 |h 75-88 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4208225939 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1821421922 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221110052743 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#B748DCA2434DD5087381CBE7E751E77B774786BA | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40270216 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Individuation,Individuation,Separation-individuation |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Individuation,Individuation,Séparation-individuation |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Individuación,Individuación |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Individuazione,Individuazione |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 个性化,个体化,个别化 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 個性化,個體化,個別化 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Individuação,Individuação |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Индивидуация (философия),Индивидуация |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Εξατομίκευση (φιλοσοφία),Εξατομίκευση,Ατομικότητα |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Selbstwerdung |