Hume's refutation of the cosmological argument

Let me summarize the results of this paper in a way that seems fitting to Hume's discussion of the cosmological argument. There are some philosophers who adopt the most stringent empiricist principles. Such men and women would reject any notion of necessity that is not analytic, and for this re...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Campbell, Joseph K. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Nature B. V 1996
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 1996, Volume: 40, Issue: 3, Pages: 159-173
Further subjects:B Rationalist Persuasion
B Material Universe
B Material Part
B Empiricist Principle
B Cosmological Argument
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1821423208
003 DE-627
005 20221110052746.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s1996 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/BF00140439  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821423208 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821423208 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Campbell, Joseph K.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Hume's refutation of the cosmological argument 
264 1 |c 1996 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Let me summarize the results of this paper in a way that seems fitting to Hume's discussion of the cosmological argument. There are some philosophers who adopt the most stringent empiricist principles. Such men and women would reject any notion of necessity that is not analytic, and for this reason they would never admit a proof of the necessary existence of anything. Other philosophers, though empiricists, are not so dogmatic. They question the need for, not the coherence of, necessary existence. They believe that the material universe is nothing over and above the sum of its material parts and, thus, see no reason to conclude that a necessary being exists based on PSR. Still others are driven by a rationalist persuasion. They would gladly recognize the existence of almost anything provided it be proven by reason and argument. When they confront the cosmological argument they do indeed find it compelling but still see no reason to conclude that God, or any transcendent being, necessarily exists. The entity established need be nothing more than the universe itself. Therefore, as Hume has demonstrated, no philosopher need accept the conclusion of the cosmological argument. 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a Rationalist Persuasion 
650 4 |a Empiricist Principle 
650 4 |a Cosmological Argument 
650 4 |a Material Universe 
650 4 |a Material Part 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970  |g 40(1996), 3, Seite 159-173  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:40  |g year:1996  |g number:3  |g pages:159-173 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1638942900  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40026984  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00140439  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208227214 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821423208 
LOK |0 005 20221110052746 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#6DD2FEDCA7268FFD422CB4B8F201D4C59BC64A79 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40026984 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL