Naming the Unnameable God: Levinas, Derrida, and Marion
In this essay I present the postmodern phenomenological approach of Levinas, Derrida, and Marion to the problem of naming the unnameable God. For Levinas, God is never experienced directly but only as a third person whose infinity is testified to in the infinity of responsibility to the hungry. For...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2006
|
In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2006, Volume: 60, Issue: 1, Pages: 99-116 |
Further subjects: | B
philosophy of religion
B Levinas B French postmodernism B Derrida B Naming God B Marion B Prayer |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1821423747 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221111223605.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221110s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-006-0010-9 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1821423747 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821423747 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)130043117 |0 (DE-627)487795482 |0 (DE-576)165965282 |4 aut |a Min, Anselm Kyongsuk |d 1940- | |
109 | |a Min, Anselm Kyongsuk 1940- |a Min, Kyongsuk 1940- |a Min, Kyong-suk 1940- |a Min, Anselm K. 1940- |a Min, Kyŏng-suk 1940- |a Min, Anselm 1940- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Naming the Unnameable God: Levinas, Derrida, and Marion |
264 | 1 | |c 2006 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In this essay I present the postmodern phenomenological approach of Levinas, Derrida, and Marion to the problem of naming the unnameable God. For Levinas, God is never experienced directly but only as a third person whose infinity is testified to in the infinity of responsibility to the hungry. For Derrida, God remains the unnameable “wholly other” accessible only as the indeterminate term of pure reference in prayer. For Marion, God remains the object of “de-nomination” through praise. In all three, the problem of naming the unnameable God is necessarily linked to how we relate to fellow human beings, to the hungry in Levinas, justice in Derrida, and charity in Marion. I also reflect on the merits and adequacy of phenomenology as such for speaking of divine transcendence. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Prayer | |
650 | 4 | |a philosophy of religion | |
650 | 4 | |a Naming God | |
650 | 4 | |a Marion | |
650 | 4 | |a Levinas | |
650 | 4 | |a French postmodernism | |
650 | 4 | |a Derrida | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 60(2006), 1, Seite 99-116 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:60 |g year:2006 |g number:1 |g pages:99-116 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27646181 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-006-0010-9 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4208227753 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1821423747 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221110052748 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#08B3FB7A1B5E1CEF377B457A27151AB2414E5CFD | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27646181 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |