There cannot be two omnipotent beings
We argue that there is no metaphysically possible world with two or more omnipotent beings, due to the potential for conflicts of will between them. We reject the objection that omnipotent beings could exist in the same world when their wills could not conflict. We then turn to Alfred Mele and M.P....
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2008
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2008, Volume: 64, Issue: 1, Pages: 21-33 |
| Further subjects: | B
New
B Conflict of will B Paradox of the stone B Omnipotence |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1821424239 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221110052750.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221110s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-007-9152-7 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1821424239 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821424239 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Baillie, James |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a There cannot be two omnipotent beings |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a We argue that there is no metaphysically possible world with two or more omnipotent beings, due to the potential for conflicts of will between them. We reject the objection that omnipotent beings could exist in the same world when their wills could not conflict. We then turn to Alfred Mele and M.P. Smith’s argument that two coexisting beings could remain omnipotent even if, on some occasions, their wills cancel each other out so that neither can bring about what they intend. We argue that this argument has an absurd consequence, namely having to regard an utterly powerless being as omnipotent. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Conflict of will | |
| 650 | 4 | |a New | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Paradox of the stone | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Omnipotence | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hagen, Jason |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 64(2008), 1, Seite 21-33 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:64 |g year:2008 |g number:1 |g pages:21-33 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1646896408 |k Electronic | ||
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40270208 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-007-9152-7 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4208228245 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1821424239 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221110052750 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#07928997C897F8F4DA9035E063F3A97768160765 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40270208 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||