Disagreeing with the (religious) skeptic
Some philosophers believe that, when epistemic peers disagree, each has an obligation to accord the other’s assessment equal weight as her own. Other philosophers worry that this Equal-Weight View is vulnerable to straightforward counterexamples, and that it requires an unacceptable degree of spinel...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2013
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2013, Volume: 74, Issue: 1, Pages: 5-17 |
| Further subjects: | B
Conciliationism
B Pluralism B Religious Disagreement B Epistemology B Uniqueness B Faith B Peer disagreement B Equal weight view |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1821424794 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221213164823.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221110s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-012-9342-9 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1821424794 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821424794 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bogardus, Tomas |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Bogardus, Tomas |a Bogardus, Tomás | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Disagreeing with the (religious) skeptic |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Some philosophers believe that, when epistemic peers disagree, each has an obligation to accord the other’s assessment equal weight as her own. Other philosophers worry that this Equal-Weight View is vulnerable to straightforward counterexamples, and that it requires an unacceptable degree of spinelessness with respect to our most treasured philosophical, political, and religious beliefs. I think that both of these allegations are false. To show this, I carefully state the Equal-Weight View, motivate it, describe apparent counterexamples to it, and then explain away the apparent counterexamples. Finally, I adapt those explanations to cases of religious disagreement. In the end, we reach the surprising conclusion that—even if the Equal-Weight View is true—in very many cases of religious disagreement between apparent epistemic peers, the parties to the disagreement need not be conciliatory. And what goes for religious beliefs goes for political and philosophical beliefs as well. This strongly suggests that the View does not demand an unacceptable degree of spinelessness. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Faith | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Uniqueness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conciliationism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Equal weight view | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Epistemology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Peer disagreement | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pluralism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Disagreement | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 74(2013), 1, Seite 5-17 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:74 |g year:2013 |g number:1 |g pages:5-17 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Errata |a Bogardus, Tomas |t Erratum to: Disagreeing with the (religious) skeptic |d 2013 |w (DE-627)1821426304 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709252 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/BOGDWT.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-012-9342-9 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4208228806 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1821424794 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221110052751 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#B5B86FDB15A548C06EEB8BE59856C312A18BEB51 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709252 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||