Loving without understanding: Raimon Panikkar’s ontological pluralism
Raimon Panikkar is one of the most sophisticated and most profound among contemporary pluralists of religion. His pluralism is radical because it is rooted in the very nature of things, in the pluralism of being itself, beyond all perspectivalism and indeed beyond truth and falsity taken as intellec...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2010
|
In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2010, Volume: 68, Issue: 1, Pages: 59-75 |
Further subjects: | B
Postmodernism
B philosophy of religion B Intellectualism B Pluralism B Panikkar B Interreligious Dialogue B Hick |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1821425065 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221111223606.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221110s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-010-9244-7 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1821425065 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821425065 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)130043117 |0 (DE-627)487795482 |0 (DE-576)165965282 |4 aut |a Min, Anselm Kyongsuk |d 1940- | |
109 | |a Min, Anselm Kyongsuk 1940- |a Min, Kyongsuk 1940- |a Min, Kyong-suk 1940- |a Min, Anselm K. 1940- |a Min, Kyŏng-suk 1940- |a Min, Anselm 1940- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Loving without understanding: Raimon Panikkar’s ontological pluralism |
264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Raimon Panikkar is one of the most sophisticated and most profound among contemporary pluralists of religion. His pluralism is radical because it is rooted in the very nature of things, in the pluralism of being itself, beyond all perspectivalism and indeed beyond truth and falsity taken as intellectual categories. I discuss several issues regarding his position. Is he indeed a pluralist or a monist in disguise? Does he do justice to the uniqueness of each religion? Is he not prematurely introducing the eschatological ideal of the harmony of opposites into the historical world where opposites often produce bloody conflicts? | ||
601 | |a Ontologie | ||
650 | 4 | |a Postmodernism | |
650 | 4 | |a Pluralism | |
650 | 4 | |a philosophy of religion | |
650 | 4 | |a Panikkar | |
650 | 4 | |a Interreligious Dialogue | |
650 | 4 | |a Intellectualism | |
650 | 4 | |a Hick | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 68(2010), 1, Seite 59-75 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:68 |g year:2010 |g number:1 |g pages:59-75 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40981209 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9244-7 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4208229071 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1821425065 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221110052752 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#5AB77B1636750AD526BF2437EF1FC93EC8D0D875 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40981209 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |