Loving without understanding: Raimon Panikkar’s ontological pluralism

Raimon Panikkar is one of the most sophisticated and most profound among contemporary pluralists of religion. His pluralism is radical because it is rooted in the very nature of things, in the pluralism of being itself, beyond all perspectivalism and indeed beyond truth and falsity taken as intellec...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Min, Anselm Kyongsuk 1940- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2010
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2010, Volume: 68, Issue: 1, Pages: 59-75
Further subjects:B Postmodernism
B philosophy of religion
B Intellectualism
B Pluralism
B Panikkar
B Interreligious Dialogue
B Hick
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1821425065
003 DE-627
005 20221111223606.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-010-9244-7  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821425065 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821425065 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)130043117  |0 (DE-627)487795482  |0 (DE-576)165965282  |4 aut  |a Min, Anselm Kyongsuk  |d 1940- 
109 |a Min, Anselm Kyongsuk 1940-  |a Min, Kyongsuk 1940-  |a Min, Kyong-suk 1940-  |a Min, Anselm K. 1940-  |a Min, Kyŏng-suk 1940-  |a Min, Anselm 1940- 
245 1 0 |a Loving without understanding: Raimon Panikkar’s ontological pluralism 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Raimon Panikkar is one of the most sophisticated and most profound among contemporary pluralists of religion. His pluralism is radical because it is rooted in the very nature of things, in the pluralism of being itself, beyond all perspectivalism and indeed beyond truth and falsity taken as intellectual categories. I discuss several issues regarding his position. Is he indeed a pluralist or a monist in disguise? Does he do justice to the uniqueness of each religion? Is he not prematurely introducing the eschatological ideal of the harmony of opposites into the historical world where opposites often produce bloody conflicts? 
601 |a Ontologie 
650 4 |a Postmodernism 
650 4 |a Pluralism 
650 4 |a philosophy of religion 
650 4 |a Panikkar 
650 4 |a Interreligious Dialogue 
650 4 |a Intellectualism 
650 4 |a Hick 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970  |g 68(2010), 1, Seite 59-75  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:68  |g year:2010  |g number:1  |g pages:59-75 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40981209  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9244-7  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 68  |j 2010  |e 1  |h 59-75 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208229071 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821425065 
LOK |0 005 20221110052752 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#5AB77B1636750AD526BF2437EF1FC93EC8D0D875 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40981209 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL