An apology for the “New Atheism”
In recent years, a series of bestselling atheist manifestos by Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, and Christopher Hitchens has thrust the topic of the rationality of religion into the public discourse. Christian moderates of an intellectual bent and even some agnostics and atheists have taken umbrage and...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2013
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2013, Volume: 73, Issue: 1, Pages: 5-28 |
| Further subjects: | B
Dawkins
B Christopher B Irrationality B Atheism B Richard B Hitchens B Harris B New Atheism B Sam |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1821426258 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221110052756.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221110s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-012-9350-9 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1821426258 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821426258 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Johnson, Andrew |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a An apology for the “New Atheism” |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In recent years, a series of bestselling atheist manifestos by Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, and Christopher Hitchens has thrust the topic of the rationality of religion into the public discourse. Christian moderates of an intellectual bent and even some agnostics and atheists have taken umbrage and lashed back. In this paper I defend the New Atheists against three common charges: that their critiques of religion commit basic logical fallacies (such as straw man, false dichotomy, or hasty generalization), that their own atheism is just as “faith-based” as the religious beliefs they criticize, and that their expressed disrespect for religious belief is immoral. | ||
| 601 | |a Atheismus | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a New Atheism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Irrationality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Christopher | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hitchens | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sam | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Harris | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Richard | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dawkins | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Atheism | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970 |g 73(2013), 1, Seite 5-28 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:73 |g year:2013 |g number:1 |g pages:5-28 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709297 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-012-9350-9 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 73 |j 2013 |e 1 |h 5-28 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4208230266 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1821426258 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221110052756 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#08253BF4E7628B1DF0D4F8BFC185D8B57C927AD0 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709297 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Richard,Richard,Richard,Richard,Richard,Richard,Richard,Richard |