The Controversy between al-Kindī and Yaḥyā b. ʿAdī on the Trinity, (part one): A Revival of the Controversy between Eunomius and the Cappadocian Fathers*

Abstract This article deals with the reasoning of the neo-Arian Eunomius of Cyzicus and the Arabic philosopher al-Kindī against the consubstantiality (τὸ ὁµοούσιον) of God the Father and God the Son and of three divine hypostases respectively. I wish to make evident that al-Kindī attacks the doctrin...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schöck, Cornelia (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2012
In: Oriens
Year: 2012, Volume: 40, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-50
Further subjects:B reductio ad absurdum
B same
B Trinity
B Hypostasis
B Substance
B Other
B Christian-Islamic dialogue
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1821437004
003 DE-627
005 20221116162951.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/187783712X634652  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821437004 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821437004 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Schöck, Cornelia  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Schöck, Cornelia 
245 1 4 |a The Controversy between al-Kindī and Yaḥyā b. ʿAdī on the Trinity, (part one): A Revival of the Controversy between Eunomius and the Cappadocian Fathers* 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract This article deals with the reasoning of the neo-Arian Eunomius of Cyzicus and the Arabic philosopher al-Kindī against the consubstantiality (τὸ ὁµοούσιον) of God the Father and God the Son and of three divine hypostases respectively. I wish to make evident that al-Kindī attacks the doctrine of Eunomius’ main adversaries Basil of Caesarea and Gregory of Nyssa as well as the doctrine of John Philoponus by taking up Aetius’ and Eunomius’ argument of the logical impossibility that the Ingenerate becomes generate. The philosophical and logico-semantic issue of dispute in the controversy is undistributed commonness versus distributed commonness (κοινωνία/cf. ʿumūm), in other words intension versus extension. An investigation of Yaḥyā b. ʿAdī’s counter-refutation is forthcoming in one of the next volumes of Oriens. 
650 4 |a reductio ad absurdum 
650 4 |a Other 
650 4 |a same 
650 4 |a Hypostasis 
650 4 |a Substance 
650 4 |a Trinity 
650 4 |a Christian-Islamic dialogue 
650 4 |a reductio ad absurdum 
650 4 |a Other 
650 4 |a same 
650 4 |a Hypostasis 
650 4 |a Substance 
650 4 |a Trinity 
650 4 |a Christian-Islamic dialogue 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Oriens  |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1948  |g 40(2012), 1, Seite 1-50  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)504272314  |w (DE-600)2213264-8  |w (DE-576)251711080  |x 1877-8372  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:40  |g year:2012  |g number:1  |g pages:1-50 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/42636407  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/187783712X634652  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/orie/40/1/article-p1_1.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208241055 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821437004 
LOK |0 005 20221116162951 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-02#475A76144E26D73FB9F402E938CE5A5BF58675CF 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/42636407 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL 

Similar Items

more