Critical Realism, Social Constructivism, and the Trinity

Science is a socially conditioned enterprise that strives for maximum rationality and objectivity in its explanation of the world. However, since the relativity of its social conditioning opposes its drive for objectivity, there is a philosophical tension at the very heart of science. Given this ten...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: King, John B. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge 2022
In: Theology and science
Year: 2022, Volume: 20, Issue: 4, Pages: 504-518
RelBib Classification:CF Christianity and Science
NBC Doctrine of God
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Multiperspectivalism
B philosophy of science
B Objectivity
B Relativity
B perichoresis
B Normativity
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 182204264X
003 DE-627
005 20240229091001.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221111s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/14746700.2022.2124485  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)182204264X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP182204264X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a King, John B.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Critical Realism, Social Constructivism, and the Trinity 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Science is a socially conditioned enterprise that strives for maximum rationality and objectivity in its explanation of the world. However, since the relativity of its social conditioning opposes its drive for objectivity, there is a philosophical tension at the very heart of science. Given this tension, why does science even work? More precisely, why does science converge to the truth rather than diverging from it? This article provides a philosophical description of this tension and a theological explanation of its happy resolution. 
650 4 |a perichoresis 
650 4 |a Normativity 
650 4 |a Relativity 
650 4 |a Objectivity 
650 4 |a philosophy of science 
650 4 |a Multiperspectivalism 
652 |a CF:NBC:VA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Theology and science  |d Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003  |g 20(2022), 4, Seite 504-518  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)372546447  |w (DE-600)2124364-5  |w (DE-576)261325019  |x 1474-6719  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:20  |g year:2022  |g number:4  |g pages:504-518 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2022.2124485  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4209292001 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 182204264X 
LOK |0 005 20240229091001 
LOK |0 008 221111||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-10#D235CA0254DA6ED6199C7746EB24D9133EC5DB5F 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144204389X  |a CF 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051507  |a NBC 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL